Abstract
Previous research has demonstrated that destructive behavior may be reduced through noncontingent presentation of attention when attention is identified as the stimulus responsible for behavioral maintenance. Because it may not always be possible to deliver attention in all situations, we examined the extent to which alternative stimuli that have been identified through a choice assessment would substitute for attention (the functional analysis-based reinforcer) in a noncontingent reinforcement procedure. Prior to treatment, functional analyses demonstrated that the destructive behavior of 2 clients with mental retardation was maintained by adult attention. Next, a stimulus choice assessment identified highly preferred tangible items for the 2 clients. Finally, we compared the effectiveness of two noncontingent reinforcement procedures: continuous noncontingent access to attention and continuous noncontingent access to the tangible item identified in the choice assessment. For both clients, these noncontingent reinforcement procedures reduced destructive behavior. The results are discussed in terms of the clinical implications for the treatment of destructive behavior using functional and alternative stimuli.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 229-237 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of applied behavior analysis |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1997 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Developmental disabilities
- Extinction
- Noncontingent reinforcement
- Preference assessments
- Satiation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Philosophy
- Sociology and Political Science
- Applied Psychology