Noncontingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior

Gregory P. Hanley, Cathleen C. Piazza, Wayne W. Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Scopus citations

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that destructive behavior may be reduced through noncontingent presentation of attention when attention is identified as the stimulus responsible for behavioral maintenance. Because it may not always be possible to deliver attention in all situations, we examined the extent to which alternative stimuli that have been identified through a choice assessment would substitute for attention (the functional analysis-based reinforcer) in a noncontingent reinforcement procedure. Prior to treatment, functional analyses demonstrated that the destructive behavior of 2 clients with mental retardation was maintained by adult attention. Next, a stimulus choice assessment identified highly preferred tangible items for the 2 clients. Finally, we compared the effectiveness of two noncontingent reinforcement procedures: continuous noncontingent access to attention and continuous noncontingent access to the tangible item identified in the choice assessment. For both clients, these noncontingent reinforcement procedures reduced destructive behavior. The results are discussed in terms of the clinical implications for the treatment of destructive behavior using functional and alternative stimuli.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)229-237
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of applied behavior analysis
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997

Keywords

  • Developmental disabilities
  • Extinction
  • Noncontingent reinforcement
  • Preference assessments
  • Satiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Noncontingent presentation of attention and alternative stimuli in the treatment of attention-maintained destructive behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this