Novel approach for removal of heavily encrusted ureteral stent.

Curtis Clark, Jason Bylund, Matthew Paszek, Chad Lagrange, Vernon M. Pais

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

We describe a novel approach for removal of a retained, heavily encrusted ureteral stent via combined laparoscopic cystolithotomy and pyelolithotomy. Due to noncompliance, our patient with a history of nephrolithiasis returned with large proximal and distal stones 2.5 years after placement of a left ureteral stent. Laparoscopy was performed using three 12 mm ports and two 5 mm ports. The bladder was opened in the midline and the stent divided at the ureteral orifice. The bladder stone (4.7 cm x 4 cm) was placed in a retrieval bag and the cystotomy closed with vicryl suture. The proximal ureter and renal pelvis were dissected free and incised. The stent with 2.3 cm x 1.5 cm stone on the proximal curl was removed. The incision was closed transversely with vicryl suture. The patient's recovery was uneventful, including drain removal prior to discharge on postoperative day 3. The foley was removed after a negative cystogram 7 days later. Analysis revealed calcium phosphate and struvite stones. Left ureteroscopy 2 months later revealed a widely patent proximal ureter. No complications have been identified. Laparoscopic cystolithotomy with stent division combined with pyelolithotomy can be performed safely and successfully as a single procedure to remove the heavily encrusted ureteral stent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4831-4835
Number of pages5
JournalThe Canadian journal of urology
Volume16
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Novel approach for removal of heavily encrusted ureteral stent.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Clark, C., Bylund, J., Paszek, M., Lagrange, C., & Pais, V. M. (2009). Novel approach for removal of heavily encrusted ureteral stent. The Canadian journal of urology, 16(5), 4831-4835.