TY - JOUR
T1 - Novelty is not always the best policy
T2 - Inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task
AU - Dodd, Michael D.
AU - Van Der Stigchel, Stefan
AU - Hollingworth, Andrew
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially supported by Killam and Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) postdoctoral fellowships to M.D. Dodd. We would like to thank Kristin Divis and Jim Do for their assistance in collecting the data and two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
PY - 2009/3
Y1 - 2009/3
N2 - We report a study that examined whether inhibition of return (IOR) is specific to visual search or a general characteristic of visual behavior. Participants were shown a series of scenes and were asked to (a) search each scene for a target, (b) memorize each scene, (c) rate how pleasant each scene was, or (d) view each scene freely. An examination of saccadic reaction times to probes provided evidence of IOR during search: Participants were slower to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations. For the other three conditions, however, the opposite pattern of results was observed: Participants were faster to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations, a facilitation-of-return effect that has not been reported previously. These results demonstrate that IOR is a search-specific strategy and not a general characteristic of visual attention.
AB - We report a study that examined whether inhibition of return (IOR) is specific to visual search or a general characteristic of visual behavior. Participants were shown a series of scenes and were asked to (a) search each scene for a target, (b) memorize each scene, (c) rate how pleasant each scene was, or (d) view each scene freely. An examination of saccadic reaction times to probes provided evidence of IOR during search: Participants were slower to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations. For the other three conditions, however, the opposite pattern of results was observed: Participants were faster to look at probes at previously fixated locations than to look at probes at novel locations, a facilitation-of-return effect that has not been reported previously. These results demonstrate that IOR is a search-specific strategy and not a general characteristic of visual attention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62349136124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62349136124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02294.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19222812
AN - SCOPUS:62349136124
SN - 0956-7976
VL - 20
SP - 333
EP - 339
JO - Psychological Science
JF - Psychological Science
IS - 3
ER -