TY - JOUR
T1 - Objectively Measured Physical Activity as a COPD Clinical Trial Outcome
AU - CBQC Task Force on Physical Activity
AU - Burtin, Chris
AU - Mohan, Divya
AU - Troosters, Thierry
AU - Watz, Henrik
AU - Hopkinson, Nicholas S.
AU - Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
AU - Moy, Marilyn L.
AU - Vogiatzis, Ioannis
AU - Rossiter, Harry B.
AU - Singh, Sally
AU - Merrill, Debora D.
AU - Hamilton, Alan
AU - Rennard, Stephen I.
AU - Fageras, Malin
AU - Petruzzelli, Stefano
AU - Tal-Singer, Ruth
AU - Tomaszewski, Erin
AU - Corriol-Rohou, Solange
AU - Rochester, Carolyn L.
AU - Sciurba, Frank C.
AU - Casaburi, Richard
AU - Man, William D.C.
AU - Van Lummel, Rob C.
AU - Cooper, Christopher B.
AU - Demeyer, Heleen
AU - Spruit, Martijn A.
AU - Vaes, Anouk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American College of Chest Physicians
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Background: Reduced physical activity is common in COPD and is associated with poor outcomes. Physical activity is therefore a worthy target for intervention in clinical trials; however, trials evaluating physical activity have used heterogeneous methods. Research Question: What is the available evidence on the efficacy and/or effectiveness of various interventions to enhance objectively measured physical activity in patients with COPD, taking into account the minimal preferred methodologic quality of physical activity assessment? Study Design and Methods: In this narrative review, the COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium (CBQC) task force searched three scientific databases for articles that reported the effect of an intervention on objectively measured physical activity in COPD. Based on scientific literature and expert consensus, only studies with ≥ 7 measurement days and ≥ 4 valid days of ≥ 8 h of monitoring were included in the primary analysis. Results: Thirty-seven of 110 (34%) identified studies fulfilled the criteria, investigating the efficacy and/or effectiveness of physical activity behavior change programs (n = 7), mobile or electronic-health interventions (n = 9), rehabilitative exercise (n = 9), bronchodilation (n = 6), lung volume reduction procedures (n = 3), and other interventions (n = 3). Results are generally variable, reflecting the large differences in study characteristics and outcomes. Few studies show an increase beyond the proposed minimal important change of 600 to 1100 daily steps, indicating that enhancing physical activity levels is a challenge. Interpretation: Only one-third of clinical trials measuring objective physical activity in people with COPD fulfilled the preset criteria regarding physical activity assessment. Studies showed variable effects on physical activity even when investigating similar interventions.
AB - Background: Reduced physical activity is common in COPD and is associated with poor outcomes. Physical activity is therefore a worthy target for intervention in clinical trials; however, trials evaluating physical activity have used heterogeneous methods. Research Question: What is the available evidence on the efficacy and/or effectiveness of various interventions to enhance objectively measured physical activity in patients with COPD, taking into account the minimal preferred methodologic quality of physical activity assessment? Study Design and Methods: In this narrative review, the COPD Biomarker Qualification Consortium (CBQC) task force searched three scientific databases for articles that reported the effect of an intervention on objectively measured physical activity in COPD. Based on scientific literature and expert consensus, only studies with ≥ 7 measurement days and ≥ 4 valid days of ≥ 8 h of monitoring were included in the primary analysis. Results: Thirty-seven of 110 (34%) identified studies fulfilled the criteria, investigating the efficacy and/or effectiveness of physical activity behavior change programs (n = 7), mobile or electronic-health interventions (n = 9), rehabilitative exercise (n = 9), bronchodilation (n = 6), lung volume reduction procedures (n = 3), and other interventions (n = 3). Results are generally variable, reflecting the large differences in study characteristics and outcomes. Few studies show an increase beyond the proposed minimal important change of 600 to 1100 daily steps, indicating that enhancing physical activity levels is a challenge. Interpretation: Only one-third of clinical trials measuring objective physical activity in people with COPD fulfilled the preset criteria regarding physical activity assessment. Studies showed variable effects on physical activity even when investigating similar interventions.
KW - COPD
KW - physical activity
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119521016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85119521016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.044
DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.044
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34217679
AN - SCOPUS:85119521016
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 160
SP - 2080
EP - 2100
JO - Chest
JF - Chest
IS - 6
ER -