TY - JOUR
T1 - Occasion setting by drug states
T2 - Functional equivalence following similar training history
AU - Palmatier, Matthew I.
AU - Bevins, Rick A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was partially supported by NIH (DA11893) and the UN-L Research Council. The experiments partially fulfilled the doctoral degree requirements of the first author, who was supported by NIH grant DA16179A. RA Bevins was supported by DA018114 while preparing this manuscript. We thank Cody Brooks for his thoughtful comments on a previous version of this manuscript. MedPC programs functionally equivalent to the ones used in this research are available upon request from RA Bevins at [email protected] .
PY - 2008/12/22
Y1 - 2008/12/22
N2 - Three experiments examined whether a drug state serving as a positive feature for pairings between a discrete conditional stimulus (CS, 15-s light or 15-s noise) and sucrose could transfer facilitative control to a CS with which it had never been presented. To do so, a CS was paired with a sucrose reward in the nicotine (0.4 mg/kg), amphetamine (AMP, 1 mg/kg), or chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 5 mg/kg) drug state; in separate saline sessions the CS was presented but was not followed by any reward. All three drug states facilitated responding to a discrete CS; previous studies found that this facilitation did not depend on direct associations between the drug state and sucrose. When a second discrimination was trained (e.g., CDP: light-sucrose and nicotine: noise-sucrose) the drug states facilitated responding to the CS trained in that state (nicotine: noise) as well as the CS normally presented in the other drug state (e.g., nicotine: light). A novel drug state (e.g., amphetamine) did not affect responding to either CS, indicating that the originally trained drug states had acquired functional similarity based on learning history. Also, a novel or ambiguous CS did not evoke responding in the previously trained drug state, indicating that both the features (drug states) and target conditional stimuli had to be trained in discriminations before transfer could occur.
AB - Three experiments examined whether a drug state serving as a positive feature for pairings between a discrete conditional stimulus (CS, 15-s light or 15-s noise) and sucrose could transfer facilitative control to a CS with which it had never been presented. To do so, a CS was paired with a sucrose reward in the nicotine (0.4 mg/kg), amphetamine (AMP, 1 mg/kg), or chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 5 mg/kg) drug state; in separate saline sessions the CS was presented but was not followed by any reward. All three drug states facilitated responding to a discrete CS; previous studies found that this facilitation did not depend on direct associations between the drug state and sucrose. When a second discrimination was trained (e.g., CDP: light-sucrose and nicotine: noise-sucrose) the drug states facilitated responding to the CS trained in that state (nicotine: noise) as well as the CS normally presented in the other drug state (e.g., nicotine: light). A novel drug state (e.g., amphetamine) did not affect responding to either CS, indicating that the originally trained drug states had acquired functional similarity based on learning history. Also, a novel or ambiguous CS did not evoke responding in the previously trained drug state, indicating that both the features (drug states) and target conditional stimuli had to be trained in discriminations before transfer could occur.
KW - Addictions
KW - Benzodiazepine
KW - Conditioning
KW - Dopamine
KW - Nicotinic
KW - Occasion setting
KW - Pavlovian
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=54249129790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=54249129790&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.009
DO - 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 18845189
AN - SCOPUS:54249129790
SN - 0166-4328
VL - 195
SP - 260
EP - 270
JO - Behavioural Brain Research
JF - Behavioural Brain Research
IS - 2
ER -