TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing Using an Impulse Hammer in Adults, Adolescents, and Children
AU - Rodriguez, Amanda I.
AU - Marler, Elizabeth
AU - Fitzpatrick, Denis
AU - Creutz, Thomas
AU - Cannon, Shauntelle A.
AU - Thomas, Megan L.A.
AU - Janky, Kristen L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of Interest: A.I.R. and E.M. received funding from the NIH/NIDCD for this work.
Funding Information:
Source of funding: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award number P20GM109023 and by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders under award numbers R03DC015318, T35DC008757, 5T32DC00013-36.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/7/1
Y1 - 2020/7/1
N2 - Objective:To characterize cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c-and oVEMP) responses using an impulse hammer (IH) in adults and pediatrics at standardized force levels and evaluate: The relationship of force level on VEMP amplitude, sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction on cVEMP amplitude, required number of tap stimuli, and subject comfort. Using these data, optimal testing parameters were selected.Study Design:Prospective study.Setting:Tertiary referral center.Patients:Seventy-eight healthy adults, adolescents, and children with no hearing or vestibular deficits.Interventions:All subjects received c-and oVEMP testing using IH and 500 Hz tone burst air conduction stimuli. Adults received hard, medium, and soft force levels. Adolescents and children received medium and soft force levels. A comfort questionnaire was administered pre-and post-Testing.Main Outcome Measures:IH VEMP response parameters (response rates, latency, cVEMP pre-stimulus SCM Electromyography [EMG], and peak-To-peak amplitude) were assessed per force level. Subjective reporting for patient comfort was also assessed.Results:VEMP response rates ranged from 92 to 100%. Force had a linear relationship with VEMP amplitude. SCM contraction had a linear relationship with raw cVEMP amplitude; however, dissipated with amplitude normalization. Force level did not impact the number of taps needed. A minimum peak force of 15 to 20 N, accounting for SCM contraction, and using a lower EMG monitoring limit for cVEMP is recommended to elicit reliable responses.Conclusions:Overall, IH VEMP is appropriate and comfortable to use in adults and pediatrics and can be useful when an air conduction stimulus is contraindicated or not preferred.
AB - Objective:To characterize cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c-and oVEMP) responses using an impulse hammer (IH) in adults and pediatrics at standardized force levels and evaluate: The relationship of force level on VEMP amplitude, sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction on cVEMP amplitude, required number of tap stimuli, and subject comfort. Using these data, optimal testing parameters were selected.Study Design:Prospective study.Setting:Tertiary referral center.Patients:Seventy-eight healthy adults, adolescents, and children with no hearing or vestibular deficits.Interventions:All subjects received c-and oVEMP testing using IH and 500 Hz tone burst air conduction stimuli. Adults received hard, medium, and soft force levels. Adolescents and children received medium and soft force levels. A comfort questionnaire was administered pre-and post-Testing.Main Outcome Measures:IH VEMP response parameters (response rates, latency, cVEMP pre-stimulus SCM Electromyography [EMG], and peak-To-peak amplitude) were assessed per force level. Subjective reporting for patient comfort was also assessed.Results:VEMP response rates ranged from 92 to 100%. Force had a linear relationship with VEMP amplitude. SCM contraction had a linear relationship with raw cVEMP amplitude; however, dissipated with amplitude normalization. Force level did not impact the number of taps needed. A minimum peak force of 15 to 20 N, accounting for SCM contraction, and using a lower EMG monitoring limit for cVEMP is recommended to elicit reliable responses.Conclusions:Overall, IH VEMP is appropriate and comfortable to use in adults and pediatrics and can be useful when an air conduction stimulus is contraindicated or not preferred.
KW - Impulse hammer
KW - Pediatrics
KW - Reflex hammer
KW - Vestibular
KW - Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092042333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092042333&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002632
DO - 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002632
M3 - Article
C2 - 32221109
AN - SCOPUS:85092042333
SN - 1531-7129
VL - 41
SP - 817
EP - 827
JO - Otology and Neurotology
JF - Otology and Neurotology
IS - 6
ER -