TY - JOUR
T1 - Orbital Wall Fractures and Ocular Injury
T2 - Impact on Management
AU - Christensen, Dallin N.
AU - Wagner, William D.
AU - Maar, Dennis J.
AU - Shostrom, Valerie
AU - Untrauer, Jason
AU - Chundury, Rao V.
AU - Geelan-Hansen, Katie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright 2023, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc. 2023.
PY - 2023/2/1
Y1 - 2023/2/1
N2 - Background: Orbital wall fractures are often associated with concomitant ocular injury. In some cases, detection and treatment of such injuries requires ophthalmology evaluation. Study Objective: To identify a change in ocular management as a result of ophthalmology evaluation in patients with orbital wall fractures. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort, patients >18 years of age with orbital wall fracture, and prompt evaluation by an ophthalmologist from 2012 to 2020 in a tertiary Level 1 trauma center. Results: Fifty percent of patients had a moderate and/or severe ocular injury. Ophthalmology evaluation led to an ocular management change in 27% of patients. Patients with eyelid laceration, extra-ocular motion (EOM) abnormality, and pupillary defect were more likely to have a change in management. There was no delay of surgical bony fracture management. Conclusion: In patients with midface trauma including orbital wall fractures those with eyelid laceration, EOM abnormality, and pupillary defect were likely to undergo ocular management change as a result of ophthalmology consultation.
AB - Background: Orbital wall fractures are often associated with concomitant ocular injury. In some cases, detection and treatment of such injuries requires ophthalmology evaluation. Study Objective: To identify a change in ocular management as a result of ophthalmology evaluation in patients with orbital wall fractures. Materials and Methods: Retrospective cohort, patients >18 years of age with orbital wall fracture, and prompt evaluation by an ophthalmologist from 2012 to 2020 in a tertiary Level 1 trauma center. Results: Fifty percent of patients had a moderate and/or severe ocular injury. Ophthalmology evaluation led to an ocular management change in 27% of patients. Patients with eyelid laceration, extra-ocular motion (EOM) abnormality, and pupillary defect were more likely to have a change in management. There was no delay of surgical bony fracture management. Conclusion: In patients with midface trauma including orbital wall fractures those with eyelid laceration, EOM abnormality, and pupillary defect were likely to undergo ocular management change as a result of ophthalmology consultation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147044914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147044914&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0226
DO - 10.1089/fpsam.2021.0226
M3 - Article
C2 - 35759472
AN - SCOPUS:85147044914
SN - 2689-3614
VL - 25
SP - 22
EP - 26
JO - Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
JF - Facial Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine
IS - 1
ER -