TY - JOUR
T1 - Pay for performance
T2 - ACG guide for physicians
AU - Johnson, David A.
AU - Shaheen, Nicholas
AU - Sarles, Harry
AU - Cattau, Edward
AU - Deal, Stephen
AU - Flax, Ira
AU - Inadomi, John
AU - Pardoll, Peter
AU - Pike, Irving
AU - Popp, John
AU - Safdi, Michael
AU - Vasudeva, Rajeev
AU - Zetterman, Rowen
PY - 2007/10
Y1 - 2007/10
N2 - This document is the first official American College of Gastroenterology policy statement on Pay for Performance (P4P) and was approved by the ACG Board of Trustees in June 2007. This policy statement is not intended to promote or condone P4P but rather to inform members of the College as to the recommended approach to development and critical analysis of these measures. The objectives of this report are 2-fold: 1. To offer guidance to the "stakeholder" community as to the ACG leadership's rationale and evaluation process of these proposed health care policy decisions. 2. To provide to those parties involved in the development of P4P programs for gastroenterology, a template outline of key areas and principles that the ACG endorses as important parameters to define an appropriate process for a valid P4P program. The work group from the ACG Task Force included representatives from the ACG Board of Trustees as well as the following ACG committees: National Affairs, Patient Care, Practice Management, Practice Parameters, and Research. In the preparation of this document every effort was made to avoid any potential, actual, or perceived conflict of interest that might result from role as consultant/advisory board/steering committee/stock ownership in health care industry related businesses. There were no declared conflicts by the work group.
AB - This document is the first official American College of Gastroenterology policy statement on Pay for Performance (P4P) and was approved by the ACG Board of Trustees in June 2007. This policy statement is not intended to promote or condone P4P but rather to inform members of the College as to the recommended approach to development and critical analysis of these measures. The objectives of this report are 2-fold: 1. To offer guidance to the "stakeholder" community as to the ACG leadership's rationale and evaluation process of these proposed health care policy decisions. 2. To provide to those parties involved in the development of P4P programs for gastroenterology, a template outline of key areas and principles that the ACG endorses as important parameters to define an appropriate process for a valid P4P program. The work group from the ACG Task Force included representatives from the ACG Board of Trustees as well as the following ACG committees: National Affairs, Patient Care, Practice Management, Practice Parameters, and Research. In the preparation of this document every effort was made to avoid any potential, actual, or perceived conflict of interest that might result from role as consultant/advisory board/steering committee/stock ownership in health care industry related businesses. There were no declared conflicts by the work group.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848844460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848844460&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01519.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01519.x
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17897331
AN - SCOPUS:34848844460
VL - 102
SP - 2119
EP - 2122
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
SN - 0002-9270
IS - 10
ER -