Pearls and Pitfalls of Team Science

Vicki S. Conn, Ann Marie McCarthy, Marlene Z. Cohen, Cindy M. Anderson, Cheryl Killion, Holli A. DeVon, Robert Topp, Nancy L. Fahrenwald, Linda M. Herrick, Lazelle E. Benefield, Carol E. Smith, Urmeka T. Jefferson, Elizabeth A. Anderson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Formidable health problems are often best addressed by teams of scientists with varied expertise. This diversity among team members and complexities in managing teams can lead to challenges in designing, funding, conducting, and reporting research. Team science difficulties can be addressed by sophisticated planning, frequent reassessment and realignment of team strategies with goals, and consistent transparent communication. This article addresses specific strategies to build and sustain research teams, manage team meetings, strategically develop publications and grants, thrive in the midst of disciplinary and individual team member differences, embrace new ideas and change to maintain creativity, and build future team scientists and projects. The potential value in team science justifies the effort required to build and maintain efficient and effective research teams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)920-940
Number of pages21
JournalWestern journal of nursing research
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Keywords

  • interdisciplinary communication
  • research productivity
  • team science

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Nursing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pearls and Pitfalls of Team Science'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this