Perceptions of faculty evaluation in the soft sciences: A case study

Lawrence R. Jauch, James W. Gentry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

There has been considerable debate on the evaluation of faculty performance by administrators. Much of the research has focused on the "publish or perish" issue on a university-wide basis rather than considering differences between disciplines which might invalidate the effectiveness of a global evaluation policy. This paper is a case study of three areas (Business, Psychology, and Sociology/Anthropology) at Kansas State University. Significant differences were found in the orientations of the different areas and in the criteria that are being used and that should be used (according to the respondents) for performance evaluation. Despite the significant differences in the departments' orientations, all of the faculty tended to agree strongly that teaching should be an important evaluative criterion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-170
Number of pages12
JournalResearch in Higher Education
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1976

Keywords

  • administration
  • evaluation
  • research
  • teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Perceptions of faculty evaluation in the soft sciences: A case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this