TY - JOUR
T1 - Place and Policy
T2 - Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Bars and Restaurants
AU - Buettner-Schmidt, Kelly
AU - Boursaw, Blake
AU - Lobo, Marie L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Accepted for publication February 1, 2018. The authors would like to thank Anne Mattarella, MA, ELS, for editing this article and Katelyn Mills, Graduate Assistant, for assisting with data collection and management. The authors acknowledge that this study was funded by North Dakota Center for Tobacco Prevention and Control Policy Grants G11-55, G11-84, G13-83, and G13-110; these grants included manuscript preparation as a deliverable. In addition, Dr. Buettner-Schmidt received financial support and a fellowship from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nursing and Health Policy Collaborative at the University of New Mexico (Grant 60128) during Phase 1 data collection.
Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/7/1
Y1 - 2018/7/1
N2 - Background Rural populations have been identified as having tobacco use disparities, with contributing factors including less demand for policy change than in urban areas, resulting in higher age-Adjusted death rates related to tobacco use. In 2012, the rural state of North Dakota enacted a statewide comprehensive law requiring all bars and restaurants to be smoke-free. Objectives The purpose of this longitudinal study, performed in three phases, was to assess the continued effects of a statewide comprehensive smoke-free law in a primarily rural state, using a stratified random sample. Methods Particulate matter and compliance indicators were assessed in restaurants and bars 21 months after enactment of the comprehensive law. Results were compared with the findings from the Phase 1 and Phase 2 samples, in which venues were assessed before passage of the law and approximately 3 months after enactment, respectively. Results The comprehensive, statewide, smoke-free law led to immediate, sustained, and substantial reductions in secondhand smoke and eliminated previous significant disparities in secondhand smoke exposure in rural communities. Although indoor smoke-free compliance with the law was generally high, compliance in required outdoor smoke-free areas was low. Compliance with signage requirements, both indoors and outdoors, was low. Discussion The comprehensive statewide smoke-free law created a just distribution of smoke-free laws statewide, resulting in increased protection of rural populations from secondhand smoke. Targeted public health interventions to address compliance may reduce secondhand smoke levels in outlier venues that continue to have high levels of secondhand smoke.
AB - Background Rural populations have been identified as having tobacco use disparities, with contributing factors including less demand for policy change than in urban areas, resulting in higher age-Adjusted death rates related to tobacco use. In 2012, the rural state of North Dakota enacted a statewide comprehensive law requiring all bars and restaurants to be smoke-free. Objectives The purpose of this longitudinal study, performed in three phases, was to assess the continued effects of a statewide comprehensive smoke-free law in a primarily rural state, using a stratified random sample. Methods Particulate matter and compliance indicators were assessed in restaurants and bars 21 months after enactment of the comprehensive law. Results were compared with the findings from the Phase 1 and Phase 2 samples, in which venues were assessed before passage of the law and approximately 3 months after enactment, respectively. Results The comprehensive, statewide, smoke-free law led to immediate, sustained, and substantial reductions in secondhand smoke and eliminated previous significant disparities in secondhand smoke exposure in rural communities. Although indoor smoke-free compliance with the law was generally high, compliance in required outdoor smoke-free areas was low. Compliance with signage requirements, both indoors and outdoors, was low. Discussion The comprehensive statewide smoke-free law created a just distribution of smoke-free laws statewide, resulting in increased protection of rural populations from secondhand smoke. Targeted public health interventions to address compliance may reduce secondhand smoke levels in outlier venues that continue to have high levels of secondhand smoke.
KW - public policy
KW - rural health
KW - secondhand smoke
KW - smoking
KW - tobacco smoke pollution
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049864376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049864376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000286
DO - 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000286
M3 - Article
C2 - 29870518
AN - SCOPUS:85049864376
SN - 0029-6562
VL - 67
SP - 324
EP - 330
JO - Nursing research
JF - Nursing research
IS - 4
ER -