TY - JOUR
T1 - Potential risks and benefits of HIV treatment simplification
T2 - A simulation model of a proposed clinical trial
AU - Schackman, Bruce R.
AU - Scott, Callie A.
AU - Sax, Paul E.
AU - Losina, Elena
AU - Wilkin, Timothy J.
AU - McKinnon, John E.
AU - Swindells, Susan
AU - Weinstein, Milton C.
AU - Freedberg, Kenneth A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Potential conflicts of interest. S.S. has received research grants or contracts from or has served as a consultant for Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and Pfizer. P.E.S. has been a consultant for Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, and GlaxoSmithKline; has received honoraria for teaching from Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Ti-botec, and Virco; and has received grant support from Pfizer, Merck, and GlaxoSmithKline. T.J.W. has received research support from Tibotec and is on the speaker’s bureau for Merck. J.E.M. has received research support from the BMS Foundation. All other authors: no conflicts.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - Background. In recent studies, subjects who had achieved suppression of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA level while receiving an initial 3-drug antiretroviral regimen successfully maintained suppression while receiving treatment with a "boosted" protease inhibitor (PI) alone. We projected the long-term outcomes of this treatment simplification strategy to inform the design of a proposed multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Methods. We used published studies to estimate the efficacy, adverse effects, and cost of a sequence of HIV drug regimens for the simplification strategy, compared with those outcomes for the current standard-of-care (SOC) strategy. Using a published simulation model of HIV disease, we projected life expectancy, discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and discounted lifetime medical costs for each strategy. Results. Subjects who have not developed PI-resistant HIV infection at the time of failure of the simplification regimen have a greater life expectancy (27.9 vs. 27.1 years) and QALE (14.9 vs. 14.7 years), compared with SOC subjects, because they receive an additional line of therapy without negative consequences for future treatment options. The QALE for the simplification strategy remains higher than that for the SOC, unless a large proportion of patients experiencing virologic failure while receiving the simplification regimen develop PI resistance. Depending on the probability of simplification regimen failure, the advantage is maintained even if HIV develops PI resistance in 42%-70% of subjects. Projected lifetime costs are $26,500-$72,400 per person lower for the simplification strategy than for the SOC strategy. Conclusions. An HIV treatment simplification strategy involving use of a boosted PI alone may lead to longer survival overall at lower cost, compared with the SOC combination therapy, because the simplification strategy potentially adds an additional line of therapy. The risk of emergence of PI resistance during treatment with a simplified regimen is a critical determinant of the viability of this strategy.
AB - Background. In recent studies, subjects who had achieved suppression of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA level while receiving an initial 3-drug antiretroviral regimen successfully maintained suppression while receiving treatment with a "boosted" protease inhibitor (PI) alone. We projected the long-term outcomes of this treatment simplification strategy to inform the design of a proposed multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Methods. We used published studies to estimate the efficacy, adverse effects, and cost of a sequence of HIV drug regimens for the simplification strategy, compared with those outcomes for the current standard-of-care (SOC) strategy. Using a published simulation model of HIV disease, we projected life expectancy, discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), and discounted lifetime medical costs for each strategy. Results. Subjects who have not developed PI-resistant HIV infection at the time of failure of the simplification regimen have a greater life expectancy (27.9 vs. 27.1 years) and QALE (14.9 vs. 14.7 years), compared with SOC subjects, because they receive an additional line of therapy without negative consequences for future treatment options. The QALE for the simplification strategy remains higher than that for the SOC, unless a large proportion of patients experiencing virologic failure while receiving the simplification regimen develop PI resistance. Depending on the probability of simplification regimen failure, the advantage is maintained even if HIV develops PI resistance in 42%-70% of subjects. Projected lifetime costs are $26,500-$72,400 per person lower for the simplification strategy than for the SOC strategy. Conclusions. An HIV treatment simplification strategy involving use of a boosted PI alone may lead to longer survival overall at lower cost, compared with the SOC combination therapy, because the simplification strategy potentially adds an additional line of therapy. The risk of emergence of PI resistance during treatment with a simplified regimen is a critical determinant of the viability of this strategy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34848824668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34848824668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/521933
DO - 10.1086/521933
M3 - Article
C2 - 17879926
AN - SCOPUS:34848824668
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 45
SP - 1062
EP - 1070
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 8
ER -