TY - JOUR
T1 - Practice to Research and Back in a Social Service Agency
T2 - Trying to DO BETTER
AU - Tyler, Patrick M
AU - Mason, W. Alex
AU - Vollmer, Barb
AU - Trout, Alexandra L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Traditional research approaches have presented challenges for practitioners, researchers, and policy makers needing to get research to practice. The DO BETTER framework is an attempt to respond to recommendations for more efficient processes to conduct research within real-world services settings (Mason et al. ), however, there are limitations. Most agencies do not have the financial resources to conduct research, and the OTWH project, for example, would not have been possible without two large federally funded research grants. Conducting randomized controlled trials in real-world settings also poses challenges such as ethical considerations around randomization and recruitment of sample sizes large enough to detect significant effects. State wards were not allowed to participate in the OTWH research studies due to a state policy, which prevented the involvement of foster care youth in the design and testing of the intervention. Establishing research partnership also require finding the right researchers who are willing to partner on a common cause, resolving disagreements on the direction of projects or conclusions, and the time and commitment to complete large research studies (Cargo and Mercer ; Thompson et al. ; Tseng et al. ). Although a good deal was accomplished during the OTWH project, the activities described above still took over 12 years, and research on large scale dissemination is still needed.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: There is a growing emphasis of evidence-based program requirements being integrated into social welfare policies for youth care services in the U.S. This trend highlights the need for increased practitioner understanding and involvement in the research process to develop and implement evidence-based programs for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders who receive residential services. Objective: The purpose of this review was to provide residential care practitioners and researchers with an understanding of a transdisciplinary translational research approach for social service agencies and the research activities that can be included. Method: A review of the literature from a collaborative project between a social service agency and university that resulted in the development and testing of an aftercare intervention for youth departing residential programs was used to explain the framework. Result: The DO BETTER framework outlines a process that (1) focuses on input from practitioners and consumers to help determine problems that impact youth and families, (2) involves research and practitioner partnerships to conduct a variety of research activities to create solutions and (3) provides results that are useful for practitioners. The research activities of the project illustrate the iterative processes of practice to research and back to practice that included youth, caregivers, practitioners, researchers, and experts from other disciplines. Conclusion: The framework is provided to help researchers plan for collaborative research with social service agencies, and to help non-researchers in agencies become more familiar with research activities to increase their involvement in program design, testing, implementation and sustainability.
AB - Background: There is a growing emphasis of evidence-based program requirements being integrated into social welfare policies for youth care services in the U.S. This trend highlights the need for increased practitioner understanding and involvement in the research process to develop and implement evidence-based programs for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders who receive residential services. Objective: The purpose of this review was to provide residential care practitioners and researchers with an understanding of a transdisciplinary translational research approach for social service agencies and the research activities that can be included. Method: A review of the literature from a collaborative project between a social service agency and university that resulted in the development and testing of an aftercare intervention for youth departing residential programs was used to explain the framework. Result: The DO BETTER framework outlines a process that (1) focuses on input from practitioners and consumers to help determine problems that impact youth and families, (2) involves research and practitioner partnerships to conduct a variety of research activities to create solutions and (3) provides results that are useful for practitioners. The research activities of the project illustrate the iterative processes of practice to research and back to practice that included youth, caregivers, practitioners, researchers, and experts from other disciplines. Conclusion: The framework is provided to help researchers plan for collaborative research with social service agencies, and to help non-researchers in agencies become more familiar with research activities to increase their involvement in program design, testing, implementation and sustainability.
KW - Research to practice
KW - Transdisciplinary research
KW - Translational research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083894437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083894437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10566-020-09548-3
DO - 10.1007/s10566-020-09548-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85083894437
SN - 1053-1890
VL - 50
SP - 149
EP - 165
JO - Child and Youth Care Forum
JF - Child and Youth Care Forum
IS - 1
ER -