TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting crop yields and soil-plant nitrogen dynamics in the US Corn Belt
AU - Archontoulis, Sotirios V.
AU - Castellano, Michael J.
AU - Licht, Mark A.
AU - Nichols, Virginia
AU - Baum, Mitch
AU - Huber, Isaiah
AU - Martinez-Feria, Rafael
AU - Puntel, Laila
AU - Ordóñez, Raziel A.
AU - Iqbal, Javed
AU - Wright, Emily E.
AU - Dietzel, Ranae N.
AU - Helmers, Matt
AU - Vanloocke, Andy
AU - Liebman, Matt
AU - Hatfield, Jerry L.
AU - Herzmann, Daryl
AU - Córdova, S. Carolina
AU - Edmonds, Patrick
AU - Togliatti, Kaitlin
AU - Kessler, Ashlyn
AU - Danalatos, Gerasimos
AU - Pasley, Heather
AU - Pederson, Carl
AU - Lamkey, Kendall R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Crop Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Crop Science Society of America
PY - 2020/3/1
Y1 - 2020/3/1
N2 - We used the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) to predict and explain maize and soybean yields, phenology, and soil water and nitrogen (N) dynamics during the growing season in Iowa, USA. Historical, current and forecasted weather data were used to drive simulations, which were released in public four weeks after planting. In this paper, we (1) describe the methodology used to perform forecasts; (2) evaluate model prediction accuracy against data collected from 10 locations over four years; and (3) identify inputs that are key in forecasting yields and soil N dynamics. We found that the predicted median yield at planting was a very good indicator of end-of-season yields (relative root mean square error [RRMSE] of ∼20%). For reference, the prediction at maturity, when all the weather was known, had a RRMSE of 14%. The good prediction at planting time was explained by the existence of shallow water tables, which decreased model sensitivity to unknown summer precipitation by 50–64%. Model initial conditions and management information accounted for one-fourth of the variation in maize yield. End of season model evaluations indicated that the model simulated well crop phenology (R2= 0.88), root depth (R2= 0.83), biomass production (R2= 0.93), grain yield (R2= 0.90), plant N uptake (R2= 0.87), soil moisture (R2= 0.42), soil temperature (R2= 0.93), soil nitrate (R2= 0.77), and water table depth (R2= 0.41). We concluded that model set-up by the user (e.g. inclusion of water table), initial conditions, and early season measurements are very important for accurate predictions of soil water, N and crop yields in this environment.
AB - We used the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) to predict and explain maize and soybean yields, phenology, and soil water and nitrogen (N) dynamics during the growing season in Iowa, USA. Historical, current and forecasted weather data were used to drive simulations, which were released in public four weeks after planting. In this paper, we (1) describe the methodology used to perform forecasts; (2) evaluate model prediction accuracy against data collected from 10 locations over four years; and (3) identify inputs that are key in forecasting yields and soil N dynamics. We found that the predicted median yield at planting was a very good indicator of end-of-season yields (relative root mean square error [RRMSE] of ∼20%). For reference, the prediction at maturity, when all the weather was known, had a RRMSE of 14%. The good prediction at planting time was explained by the existence of shallow water tables, which decreased model sensitivity to unknown summer precipitation by 50–64%. Model initial conditions and management information accounted for one-fourth of the variation in maize yield. End of season model evaluations indicated that the model simulated well crop phenology (R2= 0.88), root depth (R2= 0.83), biomass production (R2= 0.93), grain yield (R2= 0.90), plant N uptake (R2= 0.87), soil moisture (R2= 0.42), soil temperature (R2= 0.93), soil nitrate (R2= 0.77), and water table depth (R2= 0.41). We concluded that model set-up by the user (e.g. inclusion of water table), initial conditions, and early season measurements are very important for accurate predictions of soil water, N and crop yields in this environment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85081643316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85081643316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/csc2.20039
DO - 10.1002/csc2.20039
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85081643316
SN - 0011-183X
VL - 60
SP - 721
EP - 738
JO - Crop Science
JF - Crop Science
IS - 2
ER -