TY - JOUR
T1 - Predicting PD-L1 expression on human cancer cells using next-generation sequencing information in computational simulation models
AU - Lanzel, Emily A.
AU - Paula Gomez Hernandez, M.
AU - Bates, Amber M.
AU - Treinen, Christopher N.
AU - Starman, Emily E.
AU - Fischer, Carol L.
AU - Parashar, Deepak
AU - Guthmiller, Janet M.
AU - Johnson, Georgia K.
AU - Abbasi, Taher
AU - Vali, Shireen
AU - Brogden, Kim A.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) of the National Institutes of Health (R01 DE014390) and a training grant from the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) of the National Institutes of Health (T90 DE023520). The data presented herein were obtained at the Flow Cytometry Facility, which is a Carver College of Medicine/Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center core research facility at the University of Iowa. The facility is funded through user fees and the generous financial support of the Carver College of Medicine, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, and Iowa City Veteran’s Administration Medical Center. The authors would like to thank Patricia Conrad for preparation of the figures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Purpose: Interaction of the programmed death-1 (PD-1) co-receptor on T cells with the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells can lead to immunosuppression, a key event in the pathogenesis of many tumors. Thus, determining the amount of PD-L1 in tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is important as both a diagnostic aid and a clinical predictor of immunotherapy treatment success. Because IHC reactivity can vary, we developed computational simulation models to accurately predict PD-L1 expression as a complementary assay to affirm IHC reactivity. Methods: Multiple myeloma (MM) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines were modeled as examples of our approach. Non-transformed cell models were first simulated to establish non-tumorigenic control baselines. Cell line genomic aberration profiles, from next-generation sequencing (NGS) information for MM.1S, U266B1, SCC4, SCC15, and SCC25 cell lines, were introduced into the workflow to create cancer cell line-specific simulation models. Percentage changes of PD-L1 expression with respect to control baselines were determined and verified against observed PD-L1 expression by ELISA, IHC, and flow cytometry on the same cells grown in culture. Result: The observed PD-L1 expression matched the predicted PD-L1 expression for MM.1S, U266B1, SCC4, SCC15, and SCC25 cell lines and clearly demonstrated that cell genomics play an integral role by influencing cell signaling and downstream effects on PD-L1 expression. Conclusion: This concept can easily be extended to cancer patient cells where an accurate method to predict PD-L1 expression would affirm IHC results and improve its potential as a biomarker and a clinical predictor of treatment success.
AB - Purpose: Interaction of the programmed death-1 (PD-1) co-receptor on T cells with the programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells can lead to immunosuppression, a key event in the pathogenesis of many tumors. Thus, determining the amount of PD-L1 in tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is important as both a diagnostic aid and a clinical predictor of immunotherapy treatment success. Because IHC reactivity can vary, we developed computational simulation models to accurately predict PD-L1 expression as a complementary assay to affirm IHC reactivity. Methods: Multiple myeloma (MM) and oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) cell lines were modeled as examples of our approach. Non-transformed cell models were first simulated to establish non-tumorigenic control baselines. Cell line genomic aberration profiles, from next-generation sequencing (NGS) information for MM.1S, U266B1, SCC4, SCC15, and SCC25 cell lines, were introduced into the workflow to create cancer cell line-specific simulation models. Percentage changes of PD-L1 expression with respect to control baselines were determined and verified against observed PD-L1 expression by ELISA, IHC, and flow cytometry on the same cells grown in culture. Result: The observed PD-L1 expression matched the predicted PD-L1 expression for MM.1S, U266B1, SCC4, SCC15, and SCC25 cell lines and clearly demonstrated that cell genomics play an integral role by influencing cell signaling and downstream effects on PD-L1 expression. Conclusion: This concept can easily be extended to cancer patient cells where an accurate method to predict PD-L1 expression would affirm IHC results and improve its potential as a biomarker and a clinical predictor of treatment success.
KW - Computational modeling
KW - Multiple myeloma
KW - Oral squamous cell carcinoma
KW - PD-L1
KW - Simulation modeling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989166224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84989166224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00262-016-1907-5
DO - 10.1007/s00262-016-1907-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 27688163
AN - SCOPUS:84989166224
SN - 0340-7004
VL - 65
SP - 1511
EP - 1522
JO - Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy
JF - Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy
IS - 12
ER -