TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction error representation in individuals with generalized anxiety disorder during passive avoidance
AU - White, Stuart F
AU - Geraci, Marilla
AU - Lewis, Elizabeth
AU - Leshin, Joseph
AU - Teng, Cindy
AU - Averbeck, Bruno
AU - Meffert, Harma
AU - Ernst, Monique
AU - Blair, Robert James
AU - Grillon, Christian
AU - Blair, Karina
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Objective: Deficits in reinforcement-based decision making havebeen reported in generalized anxiety disorder. However, the pathophysiology of these deficits is largely unknown; published studies have mainly examined adolescents, and the integrity of core functional processes underpinning decision making remains undetermined. In particular, it is unclear whether the representation of reinforcement prediction error (PE) (the difference between received and expected reinforcement) is disrupted in generalized anxiety disorder. This study addresses these issues in adults with the disorder. Method: Forty-six unmedicated individuals with generalized anxiety disorder and 32 healthy comparison subjects groupmatched on IQ, gender, and age performed a passive avoidance taskwhileundergoing functionalMRI.Data analyseswere performed using a computational modeling approach. Results: Behaviorally, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder showed impaired reinforcement-based decision making. Imaging results revealed that during feedback, individualswith generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy subjects showed a reduced correlation between PE and activity within the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, and other structures implicated in decision making. In addition, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy participants showed a reduced correlation between punishment PEs, but not reward PEs, and activity within the left and right lentiform nucleus/putamen. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify computational impairments during decision making in generalized anxiety disorder. PE signaling is significantly disrupted in individuals with the disorder and may lead to their decision-making deficits and excessive worry about everyday problems by disrupting the online updating ("reality check") of the current relationship between the expected values of current response options and the actual received rewards and punishments.
AB - Objective: Deficits in reinforcement-based decision making havebeen reported in generalized anxiety disorder. However, the pathophysiology of these deficits is largely unknown; published studies have mainly examined adolescents, and the integrity of core functional processes underpinning decision making remains undetermined. In particular, it is unclear whether the representation of reinforcement prediction error (PE) (the difference between received and expected reinforcement) is disrupted in generalized anxiety disorder. This study addresses these issues in adults with the disorder. Method: Forty-six unmedicated individuals with generalized anxiety disorder and 32 healthy comparison subjects groupmatched on IQ, gender, and age performed a passive avoidance taskwhileundergoing functionalMRI.Data analyseswere performed using a computational modeling approach. Results: Behaviorally, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder showed impaired reinforcement-based decision making. Imaging results revealed that during feedback, individualswith generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy subjects showed a reduced correlation between PE and activity within the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, and other structures implicated in decision making. In addition, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy participants showed a reduced correlation between punishment PEs, but not reward PEs, and activity within the left and right lentiform nucleus/putamen. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify computational impairments during decision making in generalized anxiety disorder. PE signaling is significantly disrupted in individuals with the disorder and may lead to their decision-making deficits and excessive worry about everyday problems by disrupting the online updating ("reality check") of the current relationship between the expected values of current response options and the actual received rewards and punishments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011629261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011629261&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111410
DO - 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111410
M3 - Article
C2 - 27631963
AN - SCOPUS:85011629261
SN - 0002-953X
VL - 174
SP - 110
EP - 117
JO - American Journal of Psychiatry
JF - American Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 2
ER -