TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of survival with intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia
AU - Sasaki, Koji
AU - Ravandi, Farhad
AU - Kadia, Tapan
AU - DiNardo, Courtney
AU - Borthakur, Gautam
AU - Short, Nicholas
AU - Jain, Nitin
AU - Daver, Naval
AU - Jabbour, Elias
AU - Garcia-Manero, Guillermo
AU - Khoury, Joseph
AU - Konoplev, Sergej
AU - Loghavi, Sanam
AU - Patel, Keyur
AU - Montalban-Bravo, Guillermo
AU - Masarova, Lucia
AU - Konopleva, Marina
AU - Kantarjian, Hagop
N1 - Funding Information:
Koji Sasaki reports personal fees from Otsuka and Pfizer, outside the submitted work. Tapan Kadia reports research Funding from AbbVie, Amgen, BioLine Rx, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Celgene, Jazz, and Pfizer; and personal fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Genentech, Jazz, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, and Takeda, all outside the submitted work. Courtney DiNardo reports personal fees and honoraria from AbbVie, Agios, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Jazz, Medimmune, and Syros, all outside the submitted work. Gautam Borthakur reports research funding from AbbVie, Agensys, Arvinas, AstraZeneca, Bayer Healthcare AG, BioLine Rx, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Cantargia AB, Cyclacel, Eli Lilly and Company, Esai, GlaxoSmithKline, Incyte, Merck, Novartix, Oncoceutics, Polaris, Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals, and XBiotech USA; and personal fees from Argenx, BioLine Rx, BioTheryX, FTC Therapeutics, NKarta, Strategia Therapeutics, and TPC Therapeutics, all outside the submitted work. Nicholas Short reports research funding from Takeda Oncology; and personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, and Takeda Oncology, all outside the submitted work. Nitin Jain reports research funding from Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, Genentech, AstraZeneca, BMS, Pfizer, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte, Servier, Cellectis, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Precision Biosciences, Aprea Therapeutics, and Fate Therapeutics and has received honoraria from Pharmacyclics, Janssen, AbbVie, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Cellectis, Servier, Precision Biosciences, Beigene, TG Therapeutics, and ADC Therapeutics. Naval Daver reports research funding from Daiichi‐Sankyo, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Gilead, Sevier, Genentech, Astellas, Daiichi‐Sankyo, AbbVie, Hanmi, Trovagene, FATE, Amgen, Novimmune, Glycomimetics, and ImmunoGen; and personal fees from Daiichi‐Sankyo, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Celgene, AbbVie, Astellas, Genentech, ImmunoGen, Servier, Syndax, Trillium, Gilead, Amgen, and Agios outside the submitted work. Elias Jabbour reports research funding from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Cyclacel LTD, Pfizer, and Takeda; and personal fees from AbbVie, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Amgen, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Takeda, all outside the submitted work. Guillermo Garcia‐Manero reports grants or research support from Amphivena, Helsinn, Novartis, AbbVie, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Astex, Onconova, H3 Biomedicine, Merck, Curis, Janssen, Genentech, and Aprea; and personal fees from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Astex, Helsinn, and Genentech outside the submitted work. Guillermo Montalban‐Bravo reports research funding from IFM Therapeutics. Lucia Masarova reports no conflicts of interest. Marina Konopleva reports grants and other support from AbbVie, F. Hoffman La‐Roche, Stemline Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Cellectis, Calithera, Ablynx, Agios, Ascentage, AstraZeneca, Reata Pharmaceutical, Rafael Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Janssen, and Genentech outside the submitted work; has a patent (US 7795305 B2 CDDO‐Compounds and Combination Therapy) with royalties paid to Reata Pharmaceutical, a patent (Combination Therapy With a Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor and a BCL‐2) licensed to Eli Lilly, and a patent (62/993166 Combination of a MCL‐1 Inhibitor and Midostaurin, Uses and Pharmaceutical Compositions Thereof) pending to Novartis.Farhad Ravandi reports research funding from Amgen, Cyclacel LTD, Macrogenix, Menarini Ricerche, Selvita, and Xencor; and personal fees from Amgen, Macrogenix, and Xencor, all outside the submitted work. Hagop Kantarjian reports research grants and honoraria from AbbVie, Amgen, Ascentage, BMS, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Immunogen, Jazz, Novartis, Pfizer and Sanofi; honoraria from Actinium (Advisory Board), Adaptive Biotechnologies, Aptitude Health, BioAscend, Delta Fly, Janssen Global, Oxford Biomedical and Takeda Oncology.
Funding Information:
This work is supported in part by the MD Anderson Cancer Center for Leukemia (SPORE), CA100632, the Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG) P30CA016672, and the Charif Souki Cancer Research Grant.
Funding Information:
Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG), Grant/Award Number: P30CA016672; Charif Souki Cancer Research Grant; MD Anderson Cancer Center Leukemia SPORE, Grant/Award Number: CA100632 Funding information
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - Progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Predicting outcome helps in treatment decision making. We analyzed survival as the treatment endpoint in 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy from 1980 to 2021. We divided the total study group (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 2790) and a validation group (n = 938). The associations between survival and 27 characteristics were investigated. In the training cohort, the multivariate analysis identified 12 consistent adverse prognostic variables independently associated with worse survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, worse performance status, cardiac comorbidity, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis except fever of unknown origin. We categorized patients into four prognostic groups, favorable (7%), intermediate (43%), poor (39%), and very poor (11%) with estimated 5-year survival rates of 69%, 36%, 13%, and 3% respectively (p <.001). The predictive model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients with molecular mutation profiles, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified NPM1 (favorable), PTPN11, and TP53 (both unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors. The new proposed predictive model for survival with intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML is robust and can be used to advise patients regarding their prognosis, to modify therapy in remission (e.g., proposing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission), and to compare outcome and benefits on future investigational therapies.
AB - Progress with intensive chemotherapy and supportive care measures has improved survival in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Predicting outcome helps in treatment decision making. We analyzed survival as the treatment endpoint in 3728 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive chemotherapy from 1980 to 2021. We divided the total study group (3:1 basis) into a training (n = 2790) and a validation group (n = 938). The associations between survival and 27 characteristics were investigated. In the training cohort, the multivariate analysis identified 12 consistent adverse prognostic variables independently associated with worse survival: older age, therapy-related myeloid neoplasm, worse performance status, cardiac comorbidity, leukocytosis, anemia, thrombocytopenia, elevated creatinine and lactate dehydrogenase, cytogenetic abnormalities, and the presence of infection at diagnosis except fever of unknown origin. We categorized patients into four prognostic groups, favorable (7%), intermediate (43%), poor (39%), and very poor (11%) with estimated 5-year survival rates of 69%, 36%, 13%, and 3% respectively (p <.001). The predictive model was validated in an independent cohort. In a subset of patients with molecular mutation profiles, adding the mutation profiles after accounting for the effects of previous factors identified NPM1 (favorable), PTPN11, and TP53 (both unfavorable) mutations as molecular prognostic factors. The new proposed predictive model for survival with intensive chemotherapy in patients with AML is robust and can be used to advise patients regarding their prognosis, to modify therapy in remission (e.g., proposing allogeneic stem cell transplantation in first remission), and to compare outcome and benefits on future investigational therapies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128180188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128180188&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajh.26557
DO - 10.1002/ajh.26557
M3 - Article
C2 - 35384048
AN - SCOPUS:85128180188
VL - 97
SP - 865
EP - 876
JO - American Journal of Hematology
JF - American Journal of Hematology
SN - 0361-8609
IS - 7
ER -