TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and measurement of adverse childhood experiences (ACE) among children and adolescents in the U.S.
T2 - A scoping review
AU - Lyons, Kiara
AU - Tibbits, Melissa
AU - Schmid, Kendra K.
AU - Ratnapradipa, Kendra L.
AU - Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Purpose: The study objectives were to 1) examine what methodological approaches have been used to determine adverse childhood experiences (ACE) prevalence and 2) determine the prevalence of different ACEs. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on 2009–2020 articles focused on persons 17 years and younger, highlighting screening and surveillance of ACEs, and evaluating the psychometrics of ACE screening tools. Results: A descriptive analysis categorized results of 27 articles into key methodological themes (i.e., study design, self vs. caregiver reporting, location/setting). Majority of the studies were cross-sectional (81.5%), self-reporting (74.1%) and focused on neglect, bullying/victimization and violence. There were 26 unique instruments used to assess ACEs. The prevalence for ACEs reported in the literature varied widely based on factors such as the type of ACEs examined, instrument, self vs. caregiver reporting, age group, and setting. Conclusion: Synthesis of our findings highlights the need for standardization in ACE measurement as they contribute to variations in ACE prevalence estimations and understanding the overall burden ACEs have on a population. Recommendations for improving ACE measurement among U.S. children and adolescents were provided.
AB - Purpose: The study objectives were to 1) examine what methodological approaches have been used to determine adverse childhood experiences (ACE) prevalence and 2) determine the prevalence of different ACEs. Methods: A scoping review was conducted on 2009–2020 articles focused on persons 17 years and younger, highlighting screening and surveillance of ACEs, and evaluating the psychometrics of ACE screening tools. Results: A descriptive analysis categorized results of 27 articles into key methodological themes (i.e., study design, self vs. caregiver reporting, location/setting). Majority of the studies were cross-sectional (81.5%), self-reporting (74.1%) and focused on neglect, bullying/victimization and violence. There were 26 unique instruments used to assess ACEs. The prevalence for ACEs reported in the literature varied widely based on factors such as the type of ACEs examined, instrument, self vs. caregiver reporting, age group, and setting. Conclusion: Synthesis of our findings highlights the need for standardization in ACE measurement as they contribute to variations in ACE prevalence estimations and understanding the overall burden ACEs have on a population. Recommendations for improving ACE measurement among U.S. children and adolescents were provided.
KW - ACE measurement
KW - ACE prevalence
KW - ACEs
KW - Adolescent health
KW - Youth health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165993549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165993549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107108
DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2023.107108
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165993549
SN - 0190-7409
VL - 153
JO - Children and Youth Services Review
JF - Children and Youth Services Review
M1 - 107108
ER -