TY - JOUR
T1 - Prospective evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes associated with treatment of serious infections due to gram-positive cocci
AU - Hermsen, Elizabeth D.
AU - Shull, Sara S.
AU - Mitropoulos, Isaac F.
AU - Puumala, Susan E.
AU - Rupp, Mark E.
PY - 2009/1
Y1 - 2009/1
N2 - Comparative data are needed to define the use of agents to treat serious gram-positive cocci infections. This prospective, open-label, observational cohort study included adults receiving daptomycin, linezolid, vancomycin, or oxacillin/cefazolin for complicated skin and skin structure infections, bacteremia, endocarditis, or osteomyelitis. Primary outcome was clinical response at 180 days. Secondary outcomes included response at the end of therapy, antibiotic switch due to failure, length of stay (LOS), LOS after antibiotic start, mortality, infection-related readmission, and antibiotic and hospitalization costs. One hundred seventeen patients were evaluated for complicated skin and skin structure infections (n= 37), bacteremia (n = 49), endocarditis (n = 10), and osteomyelitis (n = 21). Daptomycin (P = 0.008) and linezolid (P = 0.02) were used more often as second-line therapy. No significant differences were found in outcomes except LOS (P = 0.05), and hospitalization costs (P = 0.004) were higher with linezolid; antibiotic costs were higher for linezolid (P = 0.001) and daptomycin (P = 0.03). Response rates were similar for the study drugs, although daptomycin and linezolid were used as second-line therapy and associated with higher drug costs.
AB - Comparative data are needed to define the use of agents to treat serious gram-positive cocci infections. This prospective, open-label, observational cohort study included adults receiving daptomycin, linezolid, vancomycin, or oxacillin/cefazolin for complicated skin and skin structure infections, bacteremia, endocarditis, or osteomyelitis. Primary outcome was clinical response at 180 days. Secondary outcomes included response at the end of therapy, antibiotic switch due to failure, length of stay (LOS), LOS after antibiotic start, mortality, infection-related readmission, and antibiotic and hospitalization costs. One hundred seventeen patients were evaluated for complicated skin and skin structure infections (n= 37), bacteremia (n = 49), endocarditis (n = 10), and osteomyelitis (n = 21). Daptomycin (P = 0.008) and linezolid (P = 0.02) were used more often as second-line therapy. No significant differences were found in outcomes except LOS (P = 0.05), and hospitalization costs (P = 0.004) were higher with linezolid; antibiotic costs were higher for linezolid (P = 0.001) and daptomycin (P = 0.03). Response rates were similar for the study drugs, although daptomycin and linezolid were used as second-line therapy and associated with higher drug costs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68049098205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=68049098205&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/IPC.0b013e318184d74e
DO - 10.1097/IPC.0b013e318184d74e
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:68049098205
SN - 1056-9103
VL - 17
SP - 17
EP - 21
JO - Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
JF - Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice
IS - 1
ER -