Protective window safety films: A case study in ASTM all-hazard building code standards

K. R. Grosskopf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

As the most vulnerable component in the building envelope, fragmentation failure of glazing systems is among the leading cause of injury and death during terrorist and storm events. As a result, safety films have gained popularity as a cost-effective alternative to high-strength or laminated glass, especially for building retrofits. Various combinations of wet glazed films and mechanical attachment systems, including those satisfying ASTM F 1642 for glazing systems subject to airblast loadings, have been shown to meet windload and debris impact standards, including ASTM E 1996 standards adopted by the International Building Code (IBC). Defining these and other synergies that may exist between ASTM F -series security standards and more traditional ASTM standards that address natural hazards such as wind and seismic loading may be key in introducing anti-terrorism provisions to the commercial building industry. Such an "all-hazards" approach may compliment efforts underway to introduce meaningful terrorism resistant building standards into the IBC and minimize potential code duplication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)445-453
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of ASTM International
Volume2
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ASTM E 1996
  • ASTM F 1233
  • ASTM F 1642
  • Airblast loading
  • Cyclic wind loading
  • Glazing systems
  • Impact resistance
  • International Building Code (IBC)
  • Uniform wind loading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Engineering(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Protective window safety films: A case study in ASTM all-hazard building code standards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this