Abstract
According to a legal model of the attribution of responsibility for rape, judgments of physical and psychological causality of an alleged rapist are combined into overall evaluations of attacker responsibility. It was hypothesized that observers evaluate psychological causality by reconstructing the thought patterns of the accused rapist and by classifying this mental activity along dimensions of responsibility. Subjects read crime briefs, rated dimensions of responsibility, and assigned sentences. Factor analysis and analyses of variance indicate that observers organize psychological causality of the rapist around dimensions of intended violence, and the extent to which the attacker's thoughts are attributable to the victim. Multivariate analysis of variance confirmed the expected effects of the attacker's thoughts on judgments of culpability.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 369-382 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Sex Roles |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 7-8 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Apr 1986 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Gender Studies
- Social Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology