TY - JOUR
T1 - Public participation, procedural Fairness, and evaluations of local governance
T2 - The moderating role of uncertainty
AU - Herian, Mitchel N.
AU - Hamm, Joseph A.
AU - Tomkins, Alan J.
AU - Pytlik Zillig, Lisa M.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research was supported in part by funding from the City of Lincoln, Nebraska; the National Institute of Justice (2008-IJ-CX-0022, ‘‘Reducing Courts’ Failure to Appear Rate: A Procedural Justice Approach’’); and Joseph Hamm’s work was supported by the National Science Foundation (DGE-0903469, ‘‘IGERT: Resilience and Adaptive Governance in Stressed Watersheds’’). The findings and perspectives contained in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders.
PY - 2012/10
Y1 - 2012/10
N2 - The purpose of this article is to test whether the use of public participation by a local government increases perceptions of procedural fairness among the public and to propose an explanation for why fairness is a strong predictor of satisfaction with governmental decisions. To do this, we draw on the uncertainty management model to hypothesize that indications of procedural fairness can increase public support for government and its decisions and that fairness effects are greater for individuals who are more uncertain (less knowledgeable) about the governmental body in question. To test the hypothesis, we embedded an experiment in a survey of the public that was used by a local government to inform its budgetary decisions. The results provide support for the notion that governmental use of public input does increase perceptions of governmental fairness and that, in turn, perceptions of fairness have stronger relationships with overall governmental assessments for those who are relatively uncertain about a governmental institution.
AB - The purpose of this article is to test whether the use of public participation by a local government increases perceptions of procedural fairness among the public and to propose an explanation for why fairness is a strong predictor of satisfaction with governmental decisions. To do this, we draw on the uncertainty management model to hypothesize that indications of procedural fairness can increase public support for government and its decisions and that fairness effects are greater for individuals who are more uncertain (less knowledgeable) about the governmental body in question. To test the hypothesis, we embedded an experiment in a survey of the public that was used by a local government to inform its budgetary decisions. The results provide support for the notion that governmental use of public input does increase perceptions of governmental fairness and that, in turn, perceptions of fairness have stronger relationships with overall governmental assessments for those who are relatively uncertain about a governmental institution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866975774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866975774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jopart/mur064
DO - 10.1093/jopart/mur064
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84866975774
SN - 1053-1858
VL - 22
SP - 815
EP - 840
JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory
IS - 4
ER -