TY - JOUR
T1 - Pulpal response to dentin etched with 10% phosphoric acid
AU - Gilpatrick, Russell O.
AU - Johnson, William
AU - Moore, Douglass
AU - Turner, James
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Purpose: To histopathologically evaluate the effect of etching sound dentin with 10% phosphoric acid, in cavities prepared just within the DEJ on young patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four orthodontic patients who required premolar extractions were selected for the study. Each of the patients had facial Class V resin composite restorations placed in two maxillary premolars selected for extraction. Each preparation was cut circular, 2 mm in circumference and 0.5 mm into dentin. The dentin of one maxillary premolar preparation, randomly selected, was etched with 10% phosphoric acid (Bisco) for 20 seconds. This was followed by the placement of a dentin bonding agent (All-Bond 2) and a microfilled composite restoration (Silux). The contralateral maxillary premolar, received a similar preparation, but the dentin surface was lined with a light-cured glass ionomer liner before etching of the enamel, followed by placement of a dentin bonding agent and a microfilled resin composite restoration. One of the mandibular premolars was randomly selected as a negative control, having no treatment. Fourteen days after the placement of the restorations, the teeth were extracted, and histologically examined for insult to the pulpal tissues. Injury to the pulp was evaluated by quantitative measures of histopathology, including necrosis, infiltration by inflammatory cells, and other indicators of tissue injury. Results: Using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in pulpal histopatholoey of the teeth with etched dentin versus teeth with dentin protected by a liner or the negative control teeth (P< 0.05).
AB - Purpose: To histopathologically evaluate the effect of etching sound dentin with 10% phosphoric acid, in cavities prepared just within the DEJ on young patients. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four orthodontic patients who required premolar extractions were selected for the study. Each of the patients had facial Class V resin composite restorations placed in two maxillary premolars selected for extraction. Each preparation was cut circular, 2 mm in circumference and 0.5 mm into dentin. The dentin of one maxillary premolar preparation, randomly selected, was etched with 10% phosphoric acid (Bisco) for 20 seconds. This was followed by the placement of a dentin bonding agent (All-Bond 2) and a microfilled composite restoration (Silux). The contralateral maxillary premolar, received a similar preparation, but the dentin surface was lined with a light-cured glass ionomer liner before etching of the enamel, followed by placement of a dentin bonding agent and a microfilled resin composite restoration. One of the mandibular premolars was randomly selected as a negative control, having no treatment. Fourteen days after the placement of the restorations, the teeth were extracted, and histologically examined for insult to the pulpal tissues. Injury to the pulp was evaluated by quantitative measures of histopathology, including necrosis, infiltration by inflammatory cells, and other indicators of tissue injury. Results: Using a Kruskal-Wallis analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in pulpal histopatholoey of the teeth with etched dentin versus teeth with dentin protected by a liner or the negative control teeth (P< 0.05).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030155753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030155753&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 9002803
AN - SCOPUS:0030155753
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 9
SP - 125
EP - 129
JO - American journal of dentistry
JF - American journal of dentistry
IS - 3
ER -