TY - JOUR
T1 - Qualitative Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Nebraska
AU - Ratnapradipa, Kendra L.
AU - Napit, Krishtee
AU - Ranta, Jordan
AU - Luma, Lady Beverly
AU - Dinkel, Danae
AU - Robinson, Tamara
AU - Schabloske, Laura
AU - Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu
N1 - Funding Information:
Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at UNMC. REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a secure, web-based application designed to support data capture for research studies. REDCap at UNMC is supported by Research IT Office funded by Vice Chancellor for Research (VCR). This publication’s contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the VCR and NIH. We would like to thank our community partners who helped make this work possible, including Jolene Rohde, Comprehensive Cancer Control Program Manager at the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; Robert “Max” Norvell and Jenny Roush of CHI Health Regional Cancer Center, St. Francis; David Jones of Morrison Cancer Center, Mary Lanning Healthcare; and Tammy Neimoth of Great Plains Health Callahan Cancer Center. We would also like to thank the cancer survivors and caregivers who volunteered to participate in this research.
Funding Information:
The cancer needs assessment was funded by the UNMC Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center and its National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA036727).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Association for Cancer Education.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Compared to urban residents, rural populations are less likely to engage in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. As part of a statewide cancer needs assessment, we aimed to elicit rural perspectives about CRC screening and resources. We conducted three focus groups with rural Nebraska cancer survivors and caregivers (N = 20) in Spring 2021 using a collective case study design. Participant awareness of and knowledge about CRC screening methods varied across focus groups; overall, 95% of participants had heard of colonoscopy. Participants were less familiar with fecal tests and had confusion about them. Colonoscopy was associated with negative perceptions regarding the time, cost, and discomfort of the preparation and procedure, but some providers did not discuss alternative methods unless the patient resisted colonoscopy. Healthcare providers played a key role educating rural communities about CRC screening recommendations (age, risk) and testing options and being persistent in those recommendations. CRC awareness campaigns should include a variety of communication channels (TV, radio, billboards, health fairs, churches, healthcare settings). Promotion of CRC screening should include education about screening age guidelines, alternative test types, and informed decision-making between provider and patient regarding preferred screening methods based on the pros and cons of each test type. Individuals with a family history of colon issues (Crohn’s disease, CRC) are considered high risk and need to be aware that screening should be discussed at earlier ages.
AB - Compared to urban residents, rural populations are less likely to engage in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. As part of a statewide cancer needs assessment, we aimed to elicit rural perspectives about CRC screening and resources. We conducted three focus groups with rural Nebraska cancer survivors and caregivers (N = 20) in Spring 2021 using a collective case study design. Participant awareness of and knowledge about CRC screening methods varied across focus groups; overall, 95% of participants had heard of colonoscopy. Participants were less familiar with fecal tests and had confusion about them. Colonoscopy was associated with negative perceptions regarding the time, cost, and discomfort of the preparation and procedure, but some providers did not discuss alternative methods unless the patient resisted colonoscopy. Healthcare providers played a key role educating rural communities about CRC screening recommendations (age, risk) and testing options and being persistent in those recommendations. CRC awareness campaigns should include a variety of communication channels (TV, radio, billboards, health fairs, churches, healthcare settings). Promotion of CRC screening should include education about screening age guidelines, alternative test types, and informed decision-making between provider and patient regarding preferred screening methods based on the pros and cons of each test type. Individuals with a family history of colon issues (Crohn’s disease, CRC) are considered high risk and need to be aware that screening should be discussed at earlier ages.
KW - Cancer screening
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Focus group
KW - Qualitative analysis
KW - Rural health
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85128365954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85128365954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13187-022-02170-y
DO - 10.1007/s13187-022-02170-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 35437633
AN - SCOPUS:85128365954
SN - 0885-8195
JO - Journal of Cancer Education
JF - Journal of Cancer Education
ER -