Repeated use of computerized case simulations in a test format does not present a security risk

Thomas G. Lynch, Robert J. Zadalis, Phillip D. Schneider

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Computer-based examination formats permit evaluation of patient care strategies in a realistic context. Because such examinations are complex and difficult to develop, the same case simulations must often be used on multiple occasions. METHODS: To determine if repeated, serial administration of computerized case simulations influences performance, 8 simulations were administered over 2 consecutive years to 252 third-year medical students at the conclusion of 16 surgical clerkship rotations (8 per year). One-way analyses of variance were used to compare scores across rotations during the year and to compare scores between 2 consecutive academic years. Scheffe pairwise comparisons were used to identify trends within each academic year. RESULTS: The data demonstrate an increase in scores across rotations during the year. There is, however, no difference between scores in successive years. CONCLUSIONS: The data are consistent with an increase in knowledge during the course of the year, without evidence that test information transfer influences the performance of successive classes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)270-273
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume177
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Repeated use of computerized case simulations in a test format does not present a security risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this