Reply to "Comment on aromatic-backbone interactions in model α-helical peptides"

József Csontos, Nicholas Y. Palermo, Richard F. Murphy, Sándor Lovas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

In response to Van Mourik's comments on our paper (J Comput Chem 2007, 28, 1208.) we present an extended version of our rotation method. We also prove that intramolecular interaction energies as well the basis set superposition errors calculated with our rotation method are comparable with those obtained by the counterpoise method of Boys and Bernardi (Mol Phys 1970, 19, 533). In intramolecular interaction energy calculations, if the interacting groups are in proximity, our rotation method is recommended to avoid artificial interactions, which can be induced by fragmentation,

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4-7
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Computational Chemistry
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2008
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Counterpoise procedure
  • Intramolecular BSSE
  • Intramolecular interaction
  • Rotation method
  • Tyr-Gly dipeptide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Chemistry
  • Computational Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to "Comment on aromatic-backbone interactions in model α-helical peptides"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this