Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement

David G. Angeler, Craig R. Allen, Ahjond Garmestani, Kevin L. Pope, Dirac Twidwell, Mirco Bundschuh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations

Abstract

Different resilience concepts have different assumptions about system dynamics, which has implications for resilience-based environmental risk and impact assessment. Engineering resilience (recovery) dominates in the risk assessment literature but this definition does not account for the possibility of ecosystems to exist in multiple regimes. In this paper we discuss resilience concepts and quantification methods. Specifically, we discuss when a system fails to show engineering resilience after disturbances, indicating a shift to a potentially undesired regime. We show quantification methods that can assess the stability of this new regime to inform managers about possibilities to transform the system to a more desired regime. We point out the usefulness of an adaptive inference, modelling and management approach that is based on reiterative testing of hypothesis. This process facilitates learning about, and reduces uncertainty arising from risk and impact.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-548
Number of pages6
JournalBulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Volume101
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology
  • Pollution
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Resilience in Environmental Risk and Impact Assessment: Concepts and Measurement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this