TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk of breast cancer associated with estrogen DNA adduct biomarker
AU - Reding, Kerryn W.
AU - Han, Claire J.
AU - Whittington, Dale
AU - Zahid, Muhammad
AU - Rogan, Eleanor G.
AU - Langford, Dale
AU - Rohan, Thomas E.
AU - Chlebowski, Rowan T.
AU - Cheng, Ting Yuan David
AU - Barrington, Wendy E.
AU - Tinker, Lesley F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2020/10/1
Y1 - 2020/10/1
N2 - Background: It is biologically plausible that genotoxic estrogens, namely estrogen DNA adducts (EDA), have a role in breast cancer development. Support comes from three prior studies that reported elevated concentrations of EDA relative to estrogen metabolites and conjugates (EDA:EMC) in women with breast cancer relative to control women. Methods: In postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), EDA:EMC in 191 controls was compared with findings in 194 prediagnosis urine samples from breast cancer cases. EDA:EMC determinations were by mass spectrometry as previously described, and logistic regression was employed to estimate ORs. Results: EDA:EMC did not differ in breast cancer cases compared with controls overall [0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.23)], with a mean (SD) of 2.3 (0.8) and 2.4 (1.1) in cases and controls, respectively. Similarly, the ratio did not differ when examined by estrogen receptor or recency of biospecimen collection prior to breast cancer. Conclusions: Despite the demonstrated genotoxic properties of certain catechol estrogens resulting in EDAs, this analysis did not provide evidence for an increased breast cancer risk in relation to an elevated EDA:EMC. Impact: This analysis, conducted prospectively within postmenopausal women in the WHI study, suggests that a strong association between EDA:EMC and breast cancer could be ruled out, as this study was powered to detect an OR of 2.2 or greater.
AB - Background: It is biologically plausible that genotoxic estrogens, namely estrogen DNA adducts (EDA), have a role in breast cancer development. Support comes from three prior studies that reported elevated concentrations of EDA relative to estrogen metabolites and conjugates (EDA:EMC) in women with breast cancer relative to control women. Methods: In postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI), EDA:EMC in 191 controls was compared with findings in 194 prediagnosis urine samples from breast cancer cases. EDA:EMC determinations were by mass spectrometry as previously described, and logistic regression was employed to estimate ORs. Results: EDA:EMC did not differ in breast cancer cases compared with controls overall [0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.23)], with a mean (SD) of 2.3 (0.8) and 2.4 (1.1) in cases and controls, respectively. Similarly, the ratio did not differ when examined by estrogen receptor or recency of biospecimen collection prior to breast cancer. Conclusions: Despite the demonstrated genotoxic properties of certain catechol estrogens resulting in EDAs, this analysis did not provide evidence for an increased breast cancer risk in relation to an elevated EDA:EMC. Impact: This analysis, conducted prospectively within postmenopausal women in the WHI study, suggests that a strong association between EDA:EMC and breast cancer could be ruled out, as this study was powered to detect an OR of 2.2 or greater.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102243429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102243429&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0133
DO - 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0133
M3 - Article
C2 - 32699078
AN - SCOPUS:85102243429
SN - 1055-9965
VL - 29
SP - 2096
EP - 2099
JO - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
JF - Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
IS - 10
ER -