TY - JOUR
T1 - Rural–Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska
AU - Hughes, Alejandro G.
AU - Watanabe-Galloway, Shinobu
AU - Schnell, Paulette
AU - Soliman, Amr S.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank Harlan Sayles, MS, for assistance with data analysis. Alejandro Hughes was supported by the Cancer Epidemiology Education in Special Populations (CEESP) Program at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (Grant R25 CA1123830) from the National Cancer Institute.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2015/4/25
Y1 - 2015/4/25
N2 - Nebraska ranks 36th nationally in colorectal cancer screening. Despite recent increases in CRC screening rates, rural areas in Nebraska have consistently shown lower rates of CRC screening uptake, compared to urban areas. The objective of this study was to investigate reasons for lower CRC screening rates among Nebraska residents, especially among rural residents. We developed a questionnaire based on Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs to identify factors associated with the use of CRC screening. The questionnaire was mailed in 2014 to adults aged 50–75 years in an urban community in the east and a rural community in the west regions of the state. Multiple logistic regression models were created to assess the effects of HBM constructs, rural residence, and demographic factors on CRC screening use. Of the 1200 surveys mailed, 393 were returned (rural n = 200, urban n = 193). Rural respondents were more likely to perceive screening cost as a barrier. Rural residents were also more likely to report that CRC cannot be prevented and it would change their whole life. In multiple regression models, rural residence, perceived embarrassment, and perceived unpleasantness about screening were significantly associated with reduced odds of receiving colonoscopy. Older age (62 years and older), having a personal doctor, and perceived risk of getting CRC were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving colonoscopy. Interventions to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in rural residents should be tailored to acknowledge unique perceptions of screening methods and barriers to screening.
AB - Nebraska ranks 36th nationally in colorectal cancer screening. Despite recent increases in CRC screening rates, rural areas in Nebraska have consistently shown lower rates of CRC screening uptake, compared to urban areas. The objective of this study was to investigate reasons for lower CRC screening rates among Nebraska residents, especially among rural residents. We developed a questionnaire based on Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs to identify factors associated with the use of CRC screening. The questionnaire was mailed in 2014 to adults aged 50–75 years in an urban community in the east and a rural community in the west regions of the state. Multiple logistic regression models were created to assess the effects of HBM constructs, rural residence, and demographic factors on CRC screening use. Of the 1200 surveys mailed, 393 were returned (rural n = 200, urban n = 193). Rural respondents were more likely to perceive screening cost as a barrier. Rural residents were also more likely to report that CRC cannot be prevented and it would change their whole life. In multiple regression models, rural residence, perceived embarrassment, and perceived unpleasantness about screening were significantly associated with reduced odds of receiving colonoscopy. Older age (62 years and older), having a personal doctor, and perceived risk of getting CRC were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving colonoscopy. Interventions to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in rural residents should be tailored to acknowledge unique perceptions of screening methods and barriers to screening.
KW - Colorectal cancer screening
KW - Health Belief Model
KW - Rural disparities
KW - Rural population
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945489788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945489788&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10900-015-0032-2
DO - 10.1007/s10900-015-0032-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 25910484
AN - SCOPUS:84945489788
SN - 0094-5145
VL - 40
SP - 1065
EP - 1074
JO - Journal of Community Health
JF - Journal of Community Health
IS - 6
ER -