Science communication and the tension between evidence-based and inclusive features of policy making

Sarah Michaels, John Holmes, Louise Shaxson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Communicating science in the public policy domain requires navigating the tension between two features of good practice in modern policy making: developing evidence based approaches and inclusive deliberative processes. Results of policy-making processes that have sought to maximize these different perspectives in parallel have been and will continue to be disappointing. Ensuring the “quality” of evidence and of supporting the integration of the different kinds of inputs in the decision-making process requires nimble and astute tension brokers who undertake knowledge brokering, reconcile different ways of knowing, and recognize when reconciliation is not achievable and/or not desirable.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAdvances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages83-92
Number of pages10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Publication series

NameAdvances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research
Volume38
ISSN (Print)1878-9897
ISSN (Electronic)2213-6959

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Economic Geology
  • Computers in Earth Sciences
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Science communication and the tension between evidence-based and inclusive features of policy making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this