Screen detection has both winners and losers

John D. Keen, James Keen

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English (US)
Number of pages	1
Journal	Archives of Internal Medicine
Volume	172
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1885
State	Published - Mar 12 2012

Cite this

@article{03c9d3876e9a4449b0d2ea79e2afccee,

title = "Screen detection has both winners and losers",

author = "Keen, {John D.} and James Keen",

year = "2012",

month = mar,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1885",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "172",

journal = "JAMA Internal Medicine",

issn = "2168-6106",

publisher = "American Medical Association",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screen detection has both winners and losers

AU - Keen, John D.

AU - Keen, James

PY - 2012/3/12

Y1 - 2012/3/12

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858405878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858405878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1885

DO - 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1885

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 22412118

AN - SCOPUS:84858405878

VL - 172

JO - JAMA Internal Medicine

JF - JAMA Internal Medicine

SN - 2168-6106

IS - 5

ER -