Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?

Pediatric Brain Injury Research Network (PediBIRN) Investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The PediBIRN 4-variable clinical decision rule (CDR) detects abusive head trauma (AHT) with 96% sensitivity in pediatric intensive care (PICU) settings. Preliminary analysis of its performance in Pediatric Emergency Department settings found that elimination of its fourth predictor variable enhanced screening accuracy. Objective: To compare the AHT screening performances of the “PediBIRN-4” CDR vs. the simplified 3-variable CDR in PICU settings. Participants and settings: 973 acutely head-injured children <3 years hospitalized for intensive care across 18 sites between February 2011 and March 2021. Methods: Retrospective, secondary analysis of the combined, prospective PediBIRN data sets. AHT definitional criteria and physicians' diagnoses were applied iteratively to sort patients into abusive vs. other head trauma cohorts. Outcome measures of CDR performance included sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, ROC AUC, and the correlation between each CDR's patient-specific estimates of AHT probability and the overall positive yield of patients' completed abuse evaluations. Results: Applied accurately and consistently, both CDR's would have performed with sensitivity ≥93% and negative predictive value ≥91%. Eliminating the PediBIRN-4's fourth predictor variable resulted in significantly higher specificity (↑′d ≥19%), positive predictive value (↑′d ≥8%), and ROC AUC (↑′d ≥5%), but a 3% reduction in sensitivity. Both CDRs provided patient-specific estimates of abuse probability very strongly correlated with the positive yield of patients' completed abuse evaluations (Pearson's r = 0.95 and 0.91, p =.13). Conclusion: The PediBIRN 3-variable CDR performed with greater AHT screening accuracy than the 4-variable CDR. Both are good predictors of the results of patients' subsequent completed abuse evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105518
JournalChild Abuse and Neglect
Volume125
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022

Keywords

  • Abusive head trauma
  • Child abuse
  • Clinical decision rule
  • Clinical prediction rule
  • Screening test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this