Sesame as an allergen in Lebanese food products: Occurrence, consumption and quantitative risk assessment

Joseph Touma, Silvia Dominguez, Sébastien La Vieille, Benjamin C. Remington, Joseph L. Baumert, Jérémie Théolier, Samuel Benrejeb Godefroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite the intensive use of sesame in the Middle Eastern diet, studies on this allergen in this region are lacking. A survey on the occurrence of sesame in Lebanese food products that did not contain this allergen as an ingredient, a food consumption survey conducted in Beirut schools, and the most recent sesame eliciting dose estimates were used to build a probabilistic risk assessment model providing estimates of sesame-induced allergic reactions per eating occasion and per week in Lebanese children and adolescents. Of 1270 food samples analysed, 34% contained sesame proteins (0.44–3392 mg kg−1). Sesame was detected in 47% of unlabeled bulk samples, 43% of samples with PAL, and 27% of samples without PAL. “Sfouf” had the highest concentration of sesame proteins (mean 549 mg kg−1), highest mean exposure per eating occasion (78 mg sesame proteins for children and 103 mg sesame proteins for adolescents), and posed the highest predicted risk per eating occasion (>20%) and per week (>13% individuals predicted in simulation experience at least 1 reaction). Bakery products (notably “sfouf”) may pose a serious risk to sesame-allergic children and adolescents in Lebanon. Enhanced guidance on the use of PAL is needed to better protect allergic consumers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number112511
JournalFood and Chemical Toxicology
Volume156
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2021

Keywords

  • Eliciting dose
  • Food allergen
  • Labeling
  • Lebanon
  • Probabilistic risk assessment
  • Sesame

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Toxicology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sesame as an allergen in Lebanese food products: Occurrence, consumption and quantitative risk assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this