TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex Offender Supervision in Context
T2 - The Need for Qualitative Examinations of Social Distance in Sex Offender–Supervision Officer Relationships
AU - Bailey, Danielle J.S.
AU - Sample, Lisa L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, © 2015 SAGE Publications.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Social distance, or the level of familiarity and rapport, within the officer–offender relationship is important in reducing recidivism and promoting desistance. Although examined in a variety of contexts, few researchers have studied the social distance between sex offenders and community supervision officers. When this has been examined, little attention has been paid to the legal and regulatory structure in place specifically for sex offenders or the cultural perceptions that citizens hold about sex offenders and sex offending. Within these structural and cultural contexts, we argue that sex offenders are a unique offender group, and thus, their relationships with supervision officers are likely qualitatively different from those formed between non-sex offenders and supervision officers. Using interviews with community supervision officers and convicted sex offenders, we highlight the structural and cultural contexts under which sex offenders are supervised and the ways in which the social distance in sex offender–officer relationships may vary from non-sex offender–officer relationships.
AB - Social distance, or the level of familiarity and rapport, within the officer–offender relationship is important in reducing recidivism and promoting desistance. Although examined in a variety of contexts, few researchers have studied the social distance between sex offenders and community supervision officers. When this has been examined, little attention has been paid to the legal and regulatory structure in place specifically for sex offenders or the cultural perceptions that citizens hold about sex offenders and sex offending. Within these structural and cultural contexts, we argue that sex offenders are a unique offender group, and thus, their relationships with supervision officers are likely qualitatively different from those formed between non-sex offenders and supervision officers. Using interviews with community supervision officers and convicted sex offenders, we highlight the structural and cultural contexts under which sex offenders are supervised and the ways in which the social distance in sex offender–officer relationships may vary from non-sex offender–officer relationships.
KW - community corrections
KW - sex offenders
KW - social control
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011559252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011559252&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0887403415572876
DO - 10.1177/0887403415572876
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85011559252
SN - 0887-4034
VL - 28
SP - 176
EP - 204
JO - Criminal Justice Policy Review
JF - Criminal Justice Policy Review
IS - 2
ER -