Sexual offending in adolescence: A comparison of sibling offenders and nonsibling offenders across domains of risk and treatment need

Natasha E. Latzman, Jodi L. Viljoen, Mario J. Scalora, Daniel Ullman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sibling sexual offending has received limited empirical attention, despite estimates that approximately half of all adolescent-perpetrated sexual offenses involve a sibling victim. The present study addresses this gap by examining male adolescent sibling (n = 100) and nonsibling offenders (n = 66) with regard to maltreatment histories and scores on two adolescent risk/need assessment instruments, the ERASOR and YLS/CMI. Adolescents who sexually abused a sibling, versus a nonsibling, were more likely to have histories of sexual abuse and been exposed to domestic violence and pornography. There were no group differences on ERASOR and YLS/CMI scales. This study adds to the limited discourse on sibling sexual offending and the larger literature on the heterogeneity of adolescents who have sexually offended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)245-263
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Child Sexual Abuse
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Keywords

  • adolescent sexual offending
  • family violence
  • incest
  • risk assessment
  • sexual abuse
  • sibling

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Sexual offending in adolescence: A comparison of sibling offenders and nonsibling offenders across domains of risk and treatment need'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this