Stage progression in Ta papillary urothelial tumors: Relationship to grade, immunohistochemical expression of tumor markers, mitotic frequency and DNA ploidy

S. Holmäng, P. Andius, H. Hedelin, K. Wester, C. Busch, S. L. Johansson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

154 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: We studied 363 patients with stage Ta bladder tumors during long-term followup who were classified according to the 1998 WHO and International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classifications. We determine whether various immunohistochemical and molecular markers could predict tumor progression. Materials and Methods: A total of 680 patients in western Sweden with a first diagnosis of bladder carcinoma in 1987 and 1988 were registered and followed for at least 5 years. There were 363 (53%) tumors that were papillary stage pTa. The tumors were classified as papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential in 95 patients, low grade papillary urothelial carcinoma in 160 and high grade carcinoma in 108. Of the patients in the latter group 95 were subdivided into WHO grade 2 and 13 into WHO grade 3. Tissue from the primary tumors that progressed in stage during followup was further analyzed with immunohistochemical methods (p21, p53, Ki67 and pRb), DNA ploidy and mitotic frequency. The results were compared with those in matched controls (nonprogressors). Results: Recurrence developed in 35% of patients with papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential compared to 71% with low grade urothelial carcinoma and 73% with high grade carcinoma (p <0.0001). No papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential progressed in stage. Disease progressed in 4% of patients with low grade compared to 23% with high grade carcinoma (p <0.0001). Of the patients with WHO grade 3 disease progressed in 45% compared to grade 2 in 20% (p <0.0011). At first diagnosis p53 score was significantly higher (p <0.0022) among patients with WHO grade 2 carcinoma which later progressed compared to that in matched controls but there was no significant difference regarding the other markers. In contrast to grade 2 most grade 3 carcinoma was aneuploid, had high mitosis frequency, high p53 and Ki67 scores as well as loss of retinoblastoma gene expression. Conclusions: The 1988 WHO and International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classifications divide noninvasive papillary bladder tumors into 3 subgroups with different clinical behavior, which seems to be an advantage compared with the 1973 WHO classification. A disadvantage is that the high grade carcinoma group contains 2 subgroups with different progression rates and immunohistochemical marker profiles, corresponding to the 1999 WHO grades 2 and 3. Grade 2 tumors in patients that progressed in stage years later seem to have different immunohistochemical and molecular marker profiles compared to those in matched controls.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1124-1130
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume165
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Keywords

  • Bladder neoplasms
  • Disease progression
  • Prognosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Stage progression in Ta papillary urothelial tumors: Relationship to grade, immunohistochemical expression of tumor markers, mitotic frequency and DNA ploidy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this