TY - JOUR
T1 - Student Success Factors in Two Online Introductory-Level Natural Resource Courses
AU - Wuellner, Melissa R.
N1 - Funding Information:
Special thanks to Gail Dobbs-Tidemann and the late David Willis and Denise Peterson for their inspiration and support throughout the project. Appreciation is extended to Dalton Benage, Dan Dembkowski, Jeff Grote, Matt Phayvanh, and Craig Schake for their comments on previous versions of this manuscript. Finally, I especially thank the students of WL 220 and 230 for their participation in these courses.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 by the American Society of Agronomy.
PY - 2015/12
Y1 - 2015/12
N2 - Studies examining potential differences between face-to-face and online courses have been confounded by dissimilarities in student characteristics and their learning strategies used in each environment. In response, research has shifted to determining which intrinsic qualities and learning approaches promote academic success online. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was used to evaluate the interplay between motivation, expectation, affectation, and learning self-regulation abilities and their potential influences on course performance and effort in two online introductory undergraduate wildlife and fisheries sciences courses. Surprisingly, motivation, expectation, affectation, and self-regulation were often negatively related to course performance but positively related to time spent on the course. Further, motivation, expectancy, and affectation were positively related to self-regulation. Such results appear confounding given that effort and the ability to self-regulate learning are often discussed as important factors to academic success, particularly in the online environment. Perhaps students are not spending time on the appropriate learning strategies for that environment or are over reporting their perceived abilities to self-regulate. Overall, this study highlights the complex interplay between intrinsic student factors, learning strategies, and academic success, and further research is needed to better facilitate online learning.
AB - Studies examining potential differences between face-to-face and online courses have been confounded by dissimilarities in student characteristics and their learning strategies used in each environment. In response, research has shifted to determining which intrinsic qualities and learning approaches promote academic success online. The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) was used to evaluate the interplay between motivation, expectation, affectation, and learning self-regulation abilities and their potential influences on course performance and effort in two online introductory undergraduate wildlife and fisheries sciences courses. Surprisingly, motivation, expectation, affectation, and self-regulation were often negatively related to course performance but positively related to time spent on the course. Further, motivation, expectancy, and affectation were positively related to self-regulation. Such results appear confounding given that effort and the ability to self-regulate learning are often discussed as important factors to academic success, particularly in the online environment. Perhaps students are not spending time on the appropriate learning strategies for that environment or are over reporting their perceived abilities to self-regulate. Overall, this study highlights the complex interplay between intrinsic student factors, learning strategies, and academic success, and further research is needed to better facilitate online learning.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047885350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047885350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4195/nse2014.12.0029
DO - 10.4195/nse2014.12.0029
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047885350
SN - 2168-8273
VL - 44
SP - 51
EP - 59
JO - Natural Sciences Education
JF - Natural Sciences Education
IS - 1
ER -