TY - GEN
T1 - Surgeons' perspectives on user-designed prototypes of microsurgery armrests
AU - Abdelrahman, Amro M.
AU - Lowndes, Bethany R.
AU - Mohan, Anita T.
AU - Noland, Shelley S.
AU - Finnie, Dawn M.
AU - Lemaine, Valerie
AU - Hallbeck, M. Susan
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the microsurgeons, surgery trainees, service designers and researchers who participated in this study. This research was made possible by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Midwest Center for Occupational Health and Safety Education and Research Center (MCOHS ERC) Pilot Research Training Program (T42 OH 008434), Mayo Clinic Center for Innovation Conduct, Enable and Design (CODE) Award and the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kem Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery. The contents of this effort are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or other associated entities.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Human Factors an Ergonomics Society Inc.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Microsurgery is considered one of the most demanding surgical techniques. In a recent American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgeons survey, respondents reported that about half their procedures lasted 8 hours or longer and 8% had tremor during their surgery. Thus, the aim of this study was to define user-centered design requirements for a microsurgery armrest, create low-fidelity armrest design concepts and evaluate microsurgeons' perspectives on the advantages/disadvantages of five potential design concepts. Direct and videotaped observations of microsurgery, user brainstorming during a co-creation workshop and semi-structured interviews were used. The resulting five microsurgery armrest concepts were presented pictorially through semi-structured interviews, where microsurgeons defined armrest design requirements as: a) an armrest that allows the surgeons to be as close as possible to the patient; b) adjustable to accommodate different procedures sites and surgeon preferences; c) rigid enough to support arms; d) is not difficult to set up; nor e) large or bulky; and f) complies with operative sterility rules. This study illustrated how involving the users (microsurgeons) early in the design process provides useful perspectives on design requirements and implementation barrier for a cost-effective ergonomic microsurgery armrest to foster sound ergonomic surgical practice and reduce musculoskeletal health risk factors during microsurgery.
AB - Microsurgery is considered one of the most demanding surgical techniques. In a recent American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgeons survey, respondents reported that about half their procedures lasted 8 hours or longer and 8% had tremor during their surgery. Thus, the aim of this study was to define user-centered design requirements for a microsurgery armrest, create low-fidelity armrest design concepts and evaluate microsurgeons' perspectives on the advantages/disadvantages of five potential design concepts. Direct and videotaped observations of microsurgery, user brainstorming during a co-creation workshop and semi-structured interviews were used. The resulting five microsurgery armrest concepts were presented pictorially through semi-structured interviews, where microsurgeons defined armrest design requirements as: a) an armrest that allows the surgeons to be as close as possible to the patient; b) adjustable to accommodate different procedures sites and surgeon preferences; c) rigid enough to support arms; d) is not difficult to set up; nor e) large or bulky; and f) complies with operative sterility rules. This study illustrated how involving the users (microsurgeons) early in the design process provides useful perspectives on design requirements and implementation barrier for a cost-effective ergonomic microsurgery armrest to foster sound ergonomic surgical practice and reduce musculoskeletal health risk factors during microsurgery.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072748897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072748897&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1541931218621241
DO - 10.1177/1541931218621241
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85072748897
T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
SP - 1047
EP - 1051
BT - 62nd Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2018
PB - Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Inc.
T2 - 62nd Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2018
Y2 - 1 October 2018 through 5 October 2018
ER -