TY - JOUR
T1 - Telling a trusted adult
T2 - Factors associated with the likelihood of disclosing child sexual abuse prior to and during a forensic interview
AU - Grandgenett, Hanna M.
AU - Pittenger, Samantha L.
AU - Dworkin, Emily R.
AU - Hansen, David J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Many child sexual abuse (CSA) survivors delay or withhold disclosure of their abuse, even when presenting for formal investigation interviews. Objective: This study examined factors that relate to the CSA disclosure process. Participants and Settings: Participants were CSA victims (N = 1,732) presenting to a Child Advocacy Center (CAC) for a forensic interview. Method: We tested a structural model to predict disclosure before and during a forensic interview using secondary data analysis. Results: Youth were less likely to disclose before a forensic interview if they witnessed domestic violence (β = -.233, p < .05). Caregivers were less likely to believe the abuse allegation if the alleged perpetrator resided in the home β = -.386, p < .05) and more likely to believe if the youth made a prior disclosure (β = .286, p < .05). Youth were more likely to disclose during the forensic interview if they were older (β = .388, p < .05), if the alleged perpetrator resided in their home (β = .209, p < .05), if they disclosed prior (β = .254, p < .05), and if their caregiver believed the allegation (β = .213, p <. 05). The alleged perpetrator residing in the youth's home (β = -0.082, p < .05) and making a prior disclosure (β = 0.060, p < .05) were both indirectly associated with forensic interview disclosure through caregiver belief. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of the family context and caregiver belief in the disclosure process for youth involved in formal CSA investigations.
AB - Background: Many child sexual abuse (CSA) survivors delay or withhold disclosure of their abuse, even when presenting for formal investigation interviews. Objective: This study examined factors that relate to the CSA disclosure process. Participants and Settings: Participants were CSA victims (N = 1,732) presenting to a Child Advocacy Center (CAC) for a forensic interview. Method: We tested a structural model to predict disclosure before and during a forensic interview using secondary data analysis. Results: Youth were less likely to disclose before a forensic interview if they witnessed domestic violence (β = -.233, p < .05). Caregivers were less likely to believe the abuse allegation if the alleged perpetrator resided in the home β = -.386, p < .05) and more likely to believe if the youth made a prior disclosure (β = .286, p < .05). Youth were more likely to disclose during the forensic interview if they were older (β = .388, p < .05), if the alleged perpetrator resided in their home (β = .209, p < .05), if they disclosed prior (β = .254, p < .05), and if their caregiver believed the allegation (β = .213, p <. 05). The alleged perpetrator residing in the youth's home (β = -0.082, p < .05) and making a prior disclosure (β = 0.060, p < .05) were both indirectly associated with forensic interview disclosure through caregiver belief. Conclusions: Findings highlight the importance of the family context and caregiver belief in the disclosure process for youth involved in formal CSA investigations.
KW - Abuse discovery
KW - Caregiver belief
KW - Disclosure
KW - Forensic interview
KW - Sexual abuse
KW - Structural equation model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072535052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85072535052&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104193
DO - 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104193
M3 - Article
C2 - 31561907
AN - SCOPUS:85072535052
SN - 0145-2134
VL - 116
JO - Child Abuse and Neglect
JF - Child Abuse and Neglect
M1 - 104193
ER -