The Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program: Bringing Information to Child Abuse & Neglect Cases

Victoria Weisz, Nghi Thai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program has been rapidly expanding in its 25-year history, although there has been little sound, empirical data assessing its value. The present study compared 21 judicial hearings regarding children who had a CASA with 20 hearings for children who were on a waiting list for a CASA. Judges, CASAs, and guardians ad litem provided the data for the study. The findings indicated that CASA involvement improves the breadth and quality of information provided to the courts. Unfortunately, CASA involvement also appears to decrease the involvement of the guardian ad litem. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)204-210
Number of pages7
JournalChild Maltreatment
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2003

Keywords

  • CASA
  • Child abuse
  • Court
  • Guardian ad litem

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Court-Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program: Bringing Information to Child Abuse & Neglect Cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this