The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro

S. Srisawasdi; D. B. Boyer; J. W. Reinhardt

doi:10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X

The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro

S. Srisawasdi, D. B. Boyer, J. W. Reinhardt

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10% polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	384-389
Number of pages	6
Journal	Dental Materials
Volume	4
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X
State	Published - Dec 1988
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

composite
glass-ionomer cements
microleakage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Materials Science(all)
Dentistry(all)
Mechanics of Materials

Access to Document

10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X

Cite this

@article{071f87d31f944eecafd6ea9c8f64befd,

title = "The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro",

abstract = "The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10% polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.",

keywords = "composite, glass-ionomer cements, microleakage",

author = "S. Srisawasdi and Boyer, {D. B.} and Reinhardt, {J. W.}",

year = "1988",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "4",

pages = "384--389",

journal = "Dental Materials",

issn = "0109-5641",

publisher = "Elsevier Science",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro

AU - Srisawasdi, S.

AU - Boyer, D. B.

AU - Reinhardt, J. W.

PY - 1988/12

Y1 - 1988/12

N2 - The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10% polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.

AB - The effect of removal of the dentinal smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro was evaluated using 3 restorative techniques: a composite resin with its dentin bonding agent, a composite based with glass-ionomer lining cement, and a glass-ionomer restorative cement. The agent used to remove the smear layer was a commerical 10% polyacrylic acid. Removal of the smear layer did not have any affect on microleakage of each of 3 types of restorations considered separately. The results favor removal of the smear layer only when a glass-ionomer linear is used under the composite restoration. The microleakage of the glass-ionomer restorations was greater than either the composite or composite based with glass-ionomer liner.

KW - composite

KW - glass-ionomer cements

KW - microleakage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024150857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024150857&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X

DO - 10.1016/S0109-5641(88)80054-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 3271709

AN - SCOPUS:0024150857

SN - 0109-5641

VL - 4

SP - 384

EP - 389

JO - Dental Materials

JF - Dental Materials

IS - 6

ER -

The effect of removal of the smear layer on microleakage of Class V restorations in vitro

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this