TY - JOUR
T1 - The evaluation and management of monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance and monoclonal gammopathy of neurological significance
AU - Castillo, Jorge J.
AU - Callander, Natalie S.
AU - Baljevic, Muhamed
AU - Sborov, Douglas W.
AU - Kumar, Shaji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2021/7/1
Y1 - 2021/7/1
N2 - Despite the benign nature of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), mounting data are associating MGUS with the development of organ dysfunction, specifically monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) and monoclonal gammopathy of neurological significance (MGNS), which could be associated with substantial morbidity. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with MGRS and MGNS could benefit from treatments used for myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, depending on the underlying pathology. However, the treatment of MGRS and MGNS is not standardized, and potentially effective therapies might not be reimbursed because these conditions do not formally meet the criteria for malignant processes. The present review aims at establishing standards for the evaluation and management of MGRS and MGNS, which can facilitate the diagnosis of and provide therapeutic options for treating practitioners and patients affected by these conditions. The careful design and execution of clinical trials for patients with MGRS and MGNS are positively encouraged.
AB - Despite the benign nature of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), mounting data are associating MGUS with the development of organ dysfunction, specifically monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) and monoclonal gammopathy of neurological significance (MGNS), which could be associated with substantial morbidity. Emerging evidence suggests that patients with MGRS and MGNS could benefit from treatments used for myeloma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia, depending on the underlying pathology. However, the treatment of MGRS and MGNS is not standardized, and potentially effective therapies might not be reimbursed because these conditions do not formally meet the criteria for malignant processes. The present review aims at establishing standards for the evaluation and management of MGRS and MGNS, which can facilitate the diagnosis of and provide therapeutic options for treating practitioners and patients affected by these conditions. The careful design and execution of clinical trials for patients with MGRS and MGNS are positively encouraged.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103171180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103171180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ajh.26155
DO - 10.1002/ajh.26155
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33709474
AN - SCOPUS:85103171180
SN - 0361-8609
VL - 96
SP - 846
EP - 853
JO - American Journal of Hematology
JF - American Journal of Hematology
IS - 7
ER -