The evaluation of culpability for rape: A model of legal decision making

Richard L. Wiener, Stephen J. Vodanovich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations


An analogy was borrowed from the law to develop a legal model of the attribution of responsibility for rape. According to the model, judgments of physical and psychological causality of an alleged rapist are combined into overall evaluations of attacker responsibility. An experimental test of the model was conducted with college students. Results showed that witness identification information influenced judgments of physical causality (i.e., extent to which the situation was perceived as rape), and information about the relationship between the alleged attacker and victim influenced judgments of psychological causality (i.e., intention to rape). Judgments of physical and psychological causality interacted significantly with overall attributions of attacker responsibility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)489-500
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied
Issue number5
StatePublished - Sep 1986
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
  • Education
  • Psychology(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'The evaluation of culpability for rape: A model of legal decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this