The impact of speech supplementation and clear speech on the intelligibility and speaking rate of people with traumatic brain injury

David R. Beukelman, Susan Fager, Cara Ullman, Elizabeth Hanson, Jeri Logemann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in speech intelligibility and speaking rate for (a) habitual speech, (b) clear speech, (c) alphabet-supplemented speech, and (d) topic-supplemented speech. Eight people with severe dysarthria following traumatic brain injury participated in this project. Speakers were video recorded as they produced ten sentences under each of the four conditions. Five listeners transcribed each of the speech samples. The alphabet-supplemented speech intervention yielded significantly larger higher observed intelligibility scores than habitual speech, clear speech, topic-supplemented speech, or alphabet-supplemented habitual speech.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-242
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology
Volume10
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2002

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Rehabilitation
  • Speech and Hearing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of speech supplementation and clear speech on the intelligibility and speaking rate of people with traumatic brain injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this