The new empirical biopolitics

John R. Alford, John R. Hibbing

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

Political science traditionally has either ignored biology in favor of purely environmental explanations for political phenomena or merely ruminated about the likely role of biology, leaving data-based research on biopolitics in dangerously short supply. Currently, attention to the apparent genetic basis for political and social orientations holds the greatest promise of advancing empirical biopolitics. Thus, in this essay, we orient behavior genetics research in the larger framework of biology and politics, confront its normative implications, describe the techniques involved, assess the strengths and weaknesses of commonly employed data and procedures, and describe the next steps in this research stream. Because these next steps involve molecular genetic work, we provide some background genetic information, but we mainly urge political scientists to join interdisciplinary teams so that nature and nurture can both be employed in ongoing efforts to understand the sources of mass-scale human politics.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAnnual Review of Political Science
EditorsMargaret Levi, Simon Jackman, Nancy Rosenblum
Pages183-203
Number of pages21
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 24 2008

Publication series

NameAnnual Review of Political Science
Volume11
ISSN (Print)1094-2939

Keywords

  • Biology
  • Heredity
  • Personality
  • Political orientations
  • Twins

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The new empirical biopolitics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Alford, J. R., & Hibbing, J. R. (2008). The new empirical biopolitics. In M. Levi, S. Jackman, & N. Rosenblum (Eds.), Annual Review of Political Science (pp. 183-203). (Annual Review of Political Science; Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060806.161216