The "obama effect"? Priming contemporary racial milestones increases implicit racial bias among whites

Allison L. Skinner, Jacob E. Cheadle

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

This research was designed to test if priming the election of President Obama as a contemporary racial milestone would increase implicit racial bias among White Americans. Participants (N = 202) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: A power threat prime (Obama), a majority threat prime (shifting racial demographics of the U.S.), or no prime, before completing an implicit measure of positive and negative associations with Whites and Blacks. Consistent with group threat theory, both group threat primes increased implicit anti-Black bias. In the power threat prime (Obama) condition, only those with lower internal motivation to respond without prejudice showed elevated implicit bias. Findings indicate that framing Obama as a racial pioneer elicits group threat reactions among Whites with low internal motivation to respond without prejudice, increasing implicit anti-Black bias.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)544-558
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Group threat
  • Implicit bias
  • Internal motivation to respond without prejudice
  • Obama
  • Racial prejudice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The "obama effect"? Priming contemporary racial milestones increases implicit racial bias among whites'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this