TY - JOUR
T1 - The quality of school physical activity policies within Maryland and Virginia
AU - Smith, Erin M.
AU - Wilburn, Grace
AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Human Kinetics, Inc.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Background: Since the adoption of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, many researchers have examined changes in the school nutrition environment; however, far less research has focused on the evaluation of physical activity (PA) policies within public schools. Methods: School district wellness policies (n = 144) of Virginia and Maryland were coded using a previously validated audit tool with a scale of 0 (weakest, least comprehensive) to 1 (strongest, most comprehensive). Results: Mean policy strength was weak (.20 ± .15), and, on average, policies were moderately comprehensive (.40 ± .22). The strongest (.73 ± .44) and most comprehensive (.79 ± .40) policy subgroup addressed daily recess in elementary schools. Virginia had significantly higher scores in 9 policy groups, while Maryland had higher significant policy scores in the 2 following groups: (1) the strength and comprehensiveness of a written physical education (PE) curriculum for each grade level (Ps < .05) and (2) the strength and comprehensiveness of addressing the use of PE waivers (Ps < .05). Conclusions: PA wellness policies in Maryland and Virginia are extremely weak and only moderately comprehensive; it is unlikely that these policies will significantly influence school-based PA.
AB - Background: Since the adoption of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, many researchers have examined changes in the school nutrition environment; however, far less research has focused on the evaluation of physical activity (PA) policies within public schools. Methods: School district wellness policies (n = 144) of Virginia and Maryland were coded using a previously validated audit tool with a scale of 0 (weakest, least comprehensive) to 1 (strongest, most comprehensive). Results: Mean policy strength was weak (.20 ± .15), and, on average, policies were moderately comprehensive (.40 ± .22). The strongest (.73 ± .44) and most comprehensive (.79 ± .40) policy subgroup addressed daily recess in elementary schools. Virginia had significantly higher scores in 9 policy groups, while Maryland had higher significant policy scores in the 2 following groups: (1) the strength and comprehensiveness of a written physical education (PE) curriculum for each grade level (Ps < .05) and (2) the strength and comprehensiveness of addressing the use of PE waivers (Ps < .05). Conclusions: PA wellness policies in Maryland and Virginia are extremely weak and only moderately comprehensive; it is unlikely that these policies will significantly influence school-based PA.
KW - Local wellness policy
KW - Physical education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936071060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936071060&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1123/jpah.2013-0065
DO - 10.1123/jpah.2013-0065
M3 - Article
C2 - 24770531
AN - SCOPUS:84936071060
SN - 1543-3080
VL - 12
SP - 500
EP - 505
JO - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
JF - Journal of Physical Activity and Health
IS - 4
ER -