TY - JOUR
T1 - The risk of cardiovascular events associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
AU - Ozen, Gulsen
AU - Pedro, Sofia
AU - Michaud, Kaleb
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by partial funding from Pfizer through the ASPIRE competitive grant program. Pfizer had no input on the final manuscript. Dr. Michaud received additional research grant funding from the Rheumatology Research Foundation. 1G. Ozen, MD, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; 2S. Pedro, MS, FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas; 3K. Michaud, PhD, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, and FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, Kansas, USA. Address correspondence to Dr. K. Michaud, 986270 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA. Email: [email protected]. Accepted for publication June 8, 2020.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/5/1
Y1 - 2021/5/1
N2 - Objective. To examine the comparative effects of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) and tofacitinib against conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) on incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. RA patients with ≥ 1 year of participation in the FORWARD study, from 1998 through 2017, were assessed for incident composite CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and CVD-related death validated from hospital/death records). DMARD were categorized into 7 mutually exclusive groups: (1) csDMARD-referent; (2) tumor necrosis factor-a inhibitor (TNFi); (3) abatacept (ABA); (4) rituximab; (5) tocilizumab; (6) anakinra; and (7) tofacitinib. Glucocorticoids (GC) were assessed using a weighted cumulative exposure model, which combines information about duration, intensity, and timing of exposure into a summary measure by using the weighted sum of past oral doses (prednisolone equivalent). Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounders. Results. During median (IQR) 4.0 (1.7-8.0) years of follow-up, 1801 CVD events were identified in 18,754 RA patients. The adjusted model showed CVD risk reduction with TNFi (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.93) and ABA (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.83) compared to csDMARD. While higher GC exposure as weighted cumulative exposure was associated with increased CVD risk (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11-1.19), methotrexate (MTX) use was associated with CVD risk reduction [use vs nonuse HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90, and high dose (> 15 mg/week) vs low dose (≤ 15 mg/week) HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99]. Conclusion. ABA and TNFi were associated with decreased risk of CVD compared to csDMARD. Minimizing GC use and optimizing MTX dose may improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with RA.
AB - Objective. To examine the comparative effects of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) and tofacitinib against conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) on incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods. RA patients with ≥ 1 year of participation in the FORWARD study, from 1998 through 2017, were assessed for incident composite CVD events (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and CVD-related death validated from hospital/death records). DMARD were categorized into 7 mutually exclusive groups: (1) csDMARD-referent; (2) tumor necrosis factor-a inhibitor (TNFi); (3) abatacept (ABA); (4) rituximab; (5) tocilizumab; (6) anakinra; and (7) tofacitinib. Glucocorticoids (GC) were assessed using a weighted cumulative exposure model, which combines information about duration, intensity, and timing of exposure into a summary measure by using the weighted sum of past oral doses (prednisolone equivalent). Cox proportional hazard models were used to adjust for confounders. Results. During median (IQR) 4.0 (1.7-8.0) years of follow-up, 1801 CVD events were identified in 18,754 RA patients. The adjusted model showed CVD risk reduction with TNFi (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.93) and ABA (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.83) compared to csDMARD. While higher GC exposure as weighted cumulative exposure was associated with increased CVD risk (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.11-1.19), methotrexate (MTX) use was associated with CVD risk reduction [use vs nonuse HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90, and high dose (> 15 mg/week) vs low dose (≤ 15 mg/week) HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99]. Conclusion. ABA and TNFi were associated with decreased risk of CVD compared to csDMARD. Minimizing GC use and optimizing MTX dose may improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with RA.
KW - Biologics
KW - Cardiovascular
KW - Cohort study
KW - DMARD
KW - Rheumatoid arthritis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098981908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85098981908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.200265
DO - 10.3899/jrheum.200265
M3 - Article
C2 - 32801134
AN - SCOPUS:85098981908
SN - 0315-162X
VL - 48
SP - 648
EP - 655
JO - Journal of Rheumatology
JF - Journal of Rheumatology
IS - 5
ER -