The scholarly productivity of institutions and their faculty in leading criminology and criminal justice journals

Benjamin Steiner; John Schwartz

doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.005

The scholarly productivity of institutions and their faculty in leading criminology and criminal justice journals

Benjamin Steiner, John Schwartz

School of Criminology & Criminal Justice

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

46 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study extended the work of Sorensen and Pilgrim (2002) by examining the institutional affiliations of authors in leading criminology and criminal justice journals in the subsequent five-year period after their study. Additionally, this study replicated Fabianic's (2002) study, by assessing the average publications of the faculty at the most productive criminal justice graduate programs. The current study examined the years 2000-2004 and made comparisons to the previous studies, which assessed 1995-1999. Findings revealed the University of Cincinnati and the University of Maryland were the most productive institutions and had the most productive faculty.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	393-400
Number of pages	8
Journal	Journal of Criminal Justice
Volume	34
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.005
State	Published - Jul 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
Applied Psychology
Sociology and Political Science
Law

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.005

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The scholarly productivity of institutions and their faculty in leading criminology and criminal justice journals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{ec604624b97b4d958c44b7d17c535274,

title = "The scholarly productivity of institutions and their faculty in leading criminology and criminal justice journals",

abstract = "This study extended the work of Sorensen and Pilgrim (2002) by examining the institutional affiliations of authors in leading criminology and criminal justice journals in the subsequent five-year period after their study. Additionally, this study replicated Fabianic's (2002) study, by assessing the average publications of the faculty at the most productive criminal justice graduate programs. The current study examined the years 2000-2004 and made comparisons to the previous studies, which assessed 1995-1999. Findings revealed the University of Cincinnati and the University of Maryland were the most productive institutions and had the most productive faculty.",

author = "Benjamin Steiner and John Schwartz",

year = "2006",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.005",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "34",

pages = "393--400",

journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",

issn = "0047-2352",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The scholarly productivity of institutions and their faculty in leading criminology and criminal justice journals

AU - Steiner, Benjamin

AU - Schwartz, John

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - This study extended the work of Sorensen and Pilgrim (2002) by examining the institutional affiliations of authors in leading criminology and criminal justice journals in the subsequent five-year period after their study. Additionally, this study replicated Fabianic's (2002) study, by assessing the average publications of the faculty at the most productive criminal justice graduate programs. The current study examined the years 2000-2004 and made comparisons to the previous studies, which assessed 1995-1999. Findings revealed the University of Cincinnati and the University of Maryland were the most productive institutions and had the most productive faculty.

AB - This study extended the work of Sorensen and Pilgrim (2002) by examining the institutional affiliations of authors in leading criminology and criminal justice journals in the subsequent five-year period after their study. Additionally, this study replicated Fabianic's (2002) study, by assessing the average publications of the faculty at the most productive criminal justice graduate programs. The current study examined the years 2000-2004 and made comparisons to the previous studies, which assessed 1995-1999. Findings revealed the University of Cincinnati and the University of Maryland were the most productive institutions and had the most productive faculty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748413909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748413909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.05.005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33748413909

VL - 34

SP - 393

EP - 400

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

IS - 4

ER -