TY - JOUR
T1 - The total effects of boot camps that house juveniles
T2 - A systematic review of the evidence
AU - Meade, Benjamin
AU - Steiner, Benjamin
PY - 2010/9
Y1 - 2010/9
N2 - Boot camp programs were first introduced in the 1980s, became increasingly popular as a correctional sanction, and were widely adopted and implemented throughout the United States. This study involved an examination of the prevalence of state run boot camps for juvenile delinquents and a systematic review of the existing evaluations of boot camp programs that house juveniles. In addition to the effects of boot camps on recidivism, within program effects on participants' attitudes and perceptions of boot camp, and jurisdiction-level effects on bed space were examined. Findings revealed that boot camps are less prevalent than they were in the 1990s. Boot camps, by themselves, typically do not have an effect on participants' odds of recidivism. Boot camps do seem to improve individuals' attitudes and other behaviors within programs. Boot camps also appear to reduce the number of confinement beds jurisdictions require, often resulting in cost savings. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and practice.
AB - Boot camp programs were first introduced in the 1980s, became increasingly popular as a correctional sanction, and were widely adopted and implemented throughout the United States. This study involved an examination of the prevalence of state run boot camps for juvenile delinquents and a systematic review of the existing evaluations of boot camp programs that house juveniles. In addition to the effects of boot camps on recidivism, within program effects on participants' attitudes and perceptions of boot camp, and jurisdiction-level effects on bed space were examined. Findings revealed that boot camps are less prevalent than they were in the 1990s. Boot camps, by themselves, typically do not have an effect on participants' odds of recidivism. Boot camps do seem to improve individuals' attitudes and other behaviors within programs. Boot camps also appear to reduce the number of confinement beds jurisdictions require, often resulting in cost savings. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and practice.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957018569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957018569&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.007
DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.06.007
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:77957018569
SN - 0047-2352
VL - 38
SP - 841
EP - 853
JO - Journal of Criminal Justice
JF - Journal of Criminal Justice
IS - 5
ER -